The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

July Challenge & Parafencing Nat'l Championships

Junior Women's Saber

Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 11:15 AM

Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 KIM Zoe - - 1% 6% 25% 43% 25%
2 GREENBAUM Atara R. - - - 5% 23% 43% 29%
3 STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. - - 2% 14% 40% 43%
3 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda - - - 1% 8% 35% 55%
5 KOVACS Sophia - 1% 7% 27% 44% 21%
6 WILLIAMS Chloe C. - 1% 7% 25% 42% 26%
7 PAK Kaitlyn - - - 3% 17% 44% 36%
8 ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. - 2% 11% 30% 37% 18% 2%
9 BLUM Leah I. - - 1% 8% 30% 44% 18%
10 SHOMAN Jenna - - - 4% 21% 44% 30%
11 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. - - - 2% 14% 41% 43%
12 POSSICK Lola P. - - - 3% 16% 44% 37%
13 FOUR-GARCIA Madison - - - 2% 12% 40% 46%
14 GOUHIN Chloe - - - 2% 14% 41% 44%
15 HARRISON Imogen N. - - 2% 11% 32% 39% 16%
16 CHIN Erika J. - - 2% 12% 33% 38% 14%
17 LEE Alexandra B. - - - 5% 22% 44% 29%
18 OISHI Megumi - - 1% 5% 23% 43% 28%
19 LU Vivian Y. - - - 2% 13% 42% 44%
20 GREENBAUM Ella K. 1% 6% 23% 38% 26% 5%
21 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. - - 2% 11% 38% 49%
22 CAO Stephanie X. - 1% 8% 27% 41% 22%
23 ANDRES Katherine A. - - 5% 23% 40% 26% 5%
24 XI Shining 1% 5% 20% 33% 28% 11% 2%
25 TAO Hannah J. - - 4% 20% 40% 29% 6%
26 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. - - 2% 11% 28% 38% 20%
27 GUTHIKONDA Nithya - - 1% 9% 30% 42% 18%
28 HILD Nisha - 1% 13% 36% 35% 13% 2%
29 LIN Audrey J. 2% 16% 35% 33% 13% 1%
30 CALLAHAN Chase J. - 2% 16% 37% 33% 11% 1%
30 KER Grace 1% 8% 24% 34% 24% 8% 1%
32 DUCKETT Madison 5% 26% 38% 24% 6% -
33 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. - 1% 9% 31% 39% 18% 3%
34 YONG Erika E. - 2% 13% 33% 34% 15% 2%
35 KALRA Himani V. - 1% 8% 26% 40% 21% 4%
36 JULIEN Michelle - 2% 9% 25% 35% 23% 6%
37 CHANG Emily 1% 12% 33% 34% 16% 3% -
38 CHANG Josephine S. - - 5% 22% 39% 27% 6%
39 JUNG Irene 2% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3% -
40 OLSEN Natalie J. 2% 13% 33% 35% 15% 2%
41 MIKA Veronica 1% 8% 27% 38% 22% 3%
42 DELSOIN Chelsea C. - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
43 CHIN Sophia J. 1% 11% 29% 35% 20% 5% -
44 SZETO Chloe - 1% 10% 29% 38% 19% 3%
45 SATHYANATH Kailing - - 4% 16% 36% 35% 9%
46 XU Ellen - 1% 8% 28% 39% 21% 3%
46 GHAYALOD reya - 5% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1%
48 KOBOZEVA Tamara V. 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 10% 1%
49 TZOU Alexandra - - 5% 22% 44% 28%
50 CODY Alexandra C. - 2% 16% 36% 32% 12% 2%
51 LU Amy - 4% 23% 40% 26% 7% 1%
52 MOZHAEVA MARIA - - 4% 21% 40% 28% 6%
53 TONG Kunling - - 2% 11% 33% 39% 14%
54 WIGGERS Susan Q. - 4% 18% 36% 30% 11% 1%
55 ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. 3% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
56 SHIN Andrea Y. - 4% 24% 40% 25% 6% -
56 ERIKSON Kira R. 5% 23% 38% 26% 7% 1% -
58 MARSEE Samantha - 3% 17% 36% 33% 10%
59 LACSON Sarah 1% 12% 32% 35% 17% 3%
60 WU Erica L. 1% 9% 28% 37% 21% 4%
61 GORMAN Victoria M. 2% 17% 36% 31% 12% 2%
62 LI Amanda C. - - 1% 9% 31% 42% 16%
63 BUCHMANN Vivien - 2% 12% 31% 36% 18% 2%
64 NOVICK Mia J. 9% 30% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
65 BUHAY Rachel T. - 5% 25% 41% 24% 6% -
66 NI Sharon - 8% 29% 38% 20% 4% -
67 FANG Victoria W. 1% 7% 29% 38% 21% 5% -
68 BALAKUMARAN Maya - 7% 31% 38% 19% 4% -
69 WHANG Rebecca - - 2% 10% 31% 42% 15%
70 CHAN Audrey - 2% 15% 37% 33% 11% 1%
71 STONE Hava S. 1% 11% 31% 36% 18% 3%
72 ANDRES Charmaine G. 2% 12% 32% 36% 17% 2%
73 FEARNS Zara A. 2% 14% 35% 35% 13% 2%
74 CHIANG Emily 16% 40% 31% 11% 2% -
75 ZIELINSKI Isabella G. 5% 23% 38% 26% 7% 1%
76 FREEDMAN Janna N. - - 3% 16% 37% 35% 9%
77 XIAO julie 17% 37% 31% 12% 2% - -
78 LIGH Erenei J. 2% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3% -
78 BILILIES Sophia 1% 31% 43% 20% 4% - -
80 CHIOLDI Mina - 3% 16% 35% 32% 12% 1%
81 CARVALHO Isabela A. - - 5% 21% 38% 29% 7%
82 SHI Cathleen - 17% 41% 31% 9% 1% -
83 CHEN Xinyan - 10% 33% 37% 16% 3% -
84 KHAN Alissa 13% 36% 35% 14% 3% - -
85 PAUL Lila 4% 22% 38% 27% 9% 1%
86 LUKASHENKO Angelina 3% 18% 36% 31% 11% 1%
87 SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. 6% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
88 LIAO Siwen 5% 30% 39% 20% 5% - -
89 HURST Kennedy 1% 9% 27% 35% 22% 5% -
90 LIU Sophie 2% 19% 42% 28% 8% 1% -
90 CHANG Audrey 2% 31% 41% 21% 5% - -
92 ALFARACHE Gabriella C. 8% 41% 37% 12% 2% - -
93 BAKER Audrey C. 2% 15% 34% 33% 13% 2% -
94 KANTIPUDI Shrika 7% 53% 33% 7% 1% - -
95 CHEN Athena 76% 23% 2% - - - -
96 NEIBART Fiona 14% 37% 33% 13% 2% -
97 WEI Vivian W. 12% 35% 36% 15% 3% -
98 LIN Selena 29% 43% 22% 5% 1% -
99 CHEN Ashley 11% 38% 35% 13% 2% - -
100 ROGERS Pauline E. - 11% 40% 35% 12% 2% -
101 MATAIEV Natalie S. 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4% -
102 HWANG Gabriela M. 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3% -
103 GORDON Sarah 49% 42% 8% 1% - - -
104 BARNOVITZ Maya 17% 46% 29% 7% 1% - -
105 LU Elaine 2% 19% 38% 29% 10% 2% -
106 HUANG MADELINE 21% 41% 28% 8% 1% - -
107 JOHNSTON Lily 46% 40% 12% 2% - - -
108 JEAN Olympe G. 21% 41% 28% 9% 1% -
109 GUTHIKONDA Sunanya 9% 52% 31% 7% 1% - -
110 KIM Sujin 38% 42% 17% 3% - -
110 HOLMES Emma 27% 43% 24% 6% 1% -
112 LUKER Sophia 46% 39% 13% 2% - -
113 LIGH Karis 66% 29% 4% - - - -
113 FANG sophie 49% 41% 10% 1% - - -
115 WHITESIDES Abigail E. 56% 35% 8% 1% - - -
115 JENKINS Scotland 24% 51% 21% 3% - - -
115 LIN Grace 86% 14% 1% - - - -
115 YANG Lea 30% 41% 22% 6% 1% - -
119 HU Michelle 38% 41% 17% 4% - - -
120 SHANNON Sara 93% 7% - - - - -
121 NEELEY Leilani 83% 16% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.