The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

July Challenge & Parafencing Nat'l Championships

Junior Women's Saber

Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 11:15 AM

Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 KIM Zoe V V V V V V V V V V V V 4.9 6 +1.1
2 GREENBAUM Atara R. V V V D V V V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
3 STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. V V V V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
3 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda V V V D V V V V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
5 KOVACS Sophia V V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
6 WILLIAMS Chloe C. V V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
7 PAK Kaitlyn V V D V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
8 ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. D V V V V D V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
9 BLUM Leah I. V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
10 SHOMAN Jenna V V V V V D V V D 5.0 5 -
11 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. V V V D V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
12 POSSICK Lola P. V V V V D V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
13 FOUR-GARCIA Madison V D V V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
14 GOUHIN Chloe V V V V V D V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
15 HARRISON Imogen N. V D V V D V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
16 CHIN Erika J. D D D V V V V V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
17 LEE Alexandra B. V V V V D V V D 5.0 5 -
18 OISHI Megumi D V V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
19 LU Vivian Y. V V V V D V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
20 GREENBAUM Ella K. D V V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
21 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. V D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
22 CAO Stephanie X. D V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
23 ANDRES Katherine A. V V D V D V V D 4.0 4 -
24 XI Shining V D D V V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
25 TAO Hannah J. D V V V D V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
26 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. D D V V V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
27 GUTHIKONDA Nithya V V D D V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
28 HILD Nisha D V D V D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
29 LIN Audrey J. D D V D V V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
30 CALLAHAN Chase J. D D V V D D V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
30 KER Grace D D V D V D V V D 3.0 2 -1.0
32 DUCKETT Madison D V D D D V V D 2.0 1 -1.0
33 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. V V V V V V D 3.7 6 +2.3
34 YONG Erika E. V D V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
35 KALRA Himani V. D V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
36 JULIEN Michelle V V V V D V D 3.9 5 +1.1
37 CHANG Emily V V D V V V D 2.6 5 +2.4
38 CHANG Josephine S. V V V V V D D 4.1 5 +0.9
39 JUNG Irene V V V V V D D 2.6 5 +2.4
40 OLSEN Natalie J. V V V V D D 2.5 4 +1.5
41 MIKA Veronica V V D V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
42 DELSOIN Chelsea C. V V V V D D 3.3 4 +0.7
43 CHIN Sophia J. V D V D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
44 SZETO Chloe V V D V V D V D 3.7 4 +0.3
45 SATHYANATH Kailing V V D V V D V D 4.3 4 -0.3
46 XU Ellen V D V V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
46 GHAYALOD reya V V V D D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
48 KOBOZEVA Tamara V. V V D V D V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
49 TZOU Alexandra V D V D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
50 CODY Alexandra C. V D V V D D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
51 LU Amy V D D V V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
52 MOZHAEVA MARIA V V V D D D V D 4.1 3 -1.1
53 TONG Kunling D D V D V V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
54 WIGGERS Susan Q. D V V D V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
55 ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. V V V D D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
56 SHIN Andrea Y. D V D D V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
56 ERIKSON Kira R. D D V V V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
58 MARSEE Samantha V D D D V V D 3.3 2 -1.3
59 LACSON Sarah D V D D V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
60 WU Erica L. V V D D D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
61 GORMAN Victoria M. D D D V V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
62 LI Amanda C. D V V D D D V D 4.6 2 -2.6
63 BUCHMANN Vivien V D D D D V V D 3.6 2 -1.6
64 NOVICK Mia J. D V V D D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
65 BUHAY Rachel T. D V V V D V D 3.0 4 +1.0
66 NI Sharon V V V D V D D 2.8 4 +1.2
67 FANG Victoria W. V D V V D V D 2.9 4 +1.1
68 BALAKUMARAN Maya V D D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
69 WHANG Rebecca V D D V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
70 CHAN Audrey V V D V V D D 3.4 4 +0.6
71 STONE Hava S. V D V V D D 2.7 3 +0.3
72 ANDRES Charmaine G. V V D V D D 2.6 3 +0.4
73 FEARNS Zara A. D V D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
74 CHIANG Emily D D V V V D 1.4 3 +1.6
75 ZIELINSKI Isabella G. V V V D D D 2.1 3 +0.9
76 FREEDMAN Janna N. D D D V V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
77 XIAO julie D D D V V V D 1.4 3 +1.6
78 LIGH Erenei J. D V D V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
78 BILILIES Sophia D V D D V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
80 CHIOLDI Mina D D V V D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
81 CARVALHO Isabela A. D V V D D V D 4.1 3 -1.1
82 SHI Cathleen V D D V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
83 CHEN Xinyan V D V D V D D 2.7 3 +0.3
84 KHAN Alissa V V D V D D D 1.6 3 +1.4
85 PAUL Lila V D V D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
86 LUKASHENKO Angelina D D V D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
87 SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. V V D D D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
88 LIAO Siwen V D D D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
89 HURST Kennedy D D V D V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
90 LIU Sophie D D D D V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
90 CHANG Audrey D V D V D D D 2.0 2 -
92 ALFARACHE Gabriella C. D D V D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
93 BAKER Audrey C. V D D D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
94 KANTIPUDI Shrika D D D V V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
95 CHEN Athena D V D D D V D 0.3 2 +1.7
96 NEIBART Fiona V D D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
97 WEI Vivian W. D D D V D D 1.6 1 -0.6
98 LIN Selena D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
99 CHEN Ashley D V D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
100 ROGERS Pauline E. D D V D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
101 MATAIEV Natalie S. D D D D V D 2.7 1 -1.7
102 HWANG Gabriela M. D V D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
103 GORDON Sarah D D D D V D 0.6 1 +0.4
104 BARNOVITZ Maya V D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
105 LU Elaine D V D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
106 HUANG MADELINE D D D D D V 1.3 1 -0.3
107 JOHNSTON Lily D D V D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
108 JEAN Olympe G. D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
109 GUTHIKONDA Sunanya D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
110 KIM Sujin D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
110 HOLMES Emma D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
112 LUKER Sophia D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
113 LIGH Karis D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
113 FANG sophie D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
115 WHITESIDES Abigail E. D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
115 JENKINS Scotland D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
115 LIN Grace D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
115 YANG Lea D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
119 HU Michelle D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
120 SHANNON Sara D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
121 NEELEY Leilani D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.