The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Y-12 Men's Foil

Monday, July 11, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Minneapolis, MN, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 NICOLETTI Luca V V V V V V V V V V V V 4.3 5 +0.7
2 SOTO-ULEV Aden A. V V V V V V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
3 LIU Derek V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
3 LI Aaron V V V V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
5 KIAYIAS Aris V V V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
6 FUKUDA Diego V V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
7 MORROW Brenden V V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
8 LEE Brendan V V D V V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
9 XU Andy P. V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
10 QIAN Jason H. V V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
11 MAO Lucas V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
11 LI Bradley V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
11 CHOI Ethan V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
14 YI William V V V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
15 LO Preston V V D V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
16 TANG Alexander L. V V V D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
17 TANG Terry V V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
18 WONG Jackson V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
19 ZHANG Aaron V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
20 PARK Rion V V V V V V V V D 3.3 6 +2.7
21 WU Alber Y. V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
22 DERRICK Blake V V V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
23 YAO Bradley D V V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
24 LIU Ethan V V V V D V V V D 5.0 5 -
25 LING Eddie V V V D V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
25 GUTH Joseph V V D V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
27 PALMA Nathan Anthony V D V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
28 PARRISH Evan V V V D V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
29 TAN Aidan D V V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
30 CHENG Logan V D V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
31 NGAI Julian V D V V D V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
32 SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn D V D V D V V V D 4.6 3 -1.6
33 SIMONOV Timofey V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
34 FEDELI Francesco V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
35 CORTRIGHT Skipper D V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
36 NGUYEN Martin V V V D V V V D 5.0 5 -
37 LI Allen V V D V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
38 CHEN Kyle P. V V V V D V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
39 ZHAO Nathan V D V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
40 ALLEN Henry G. D V V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
41 YANG Charles V V V V D V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
42 LEE Christopher T. V V V D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
43 SENIC Lucas V D V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
44 CHENG Ethan V D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
45 SHENG Dalton V V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
46 GHEDINI Luca V V D V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
47 RAJ Jay V V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
48 ZHAO Adam D V D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
49 RASMUSSEN Sage V V V D D V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
50 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas V D V V V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
50 DESERANNO Leander V D D V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
52 MASSIMINO Andrew V V V V D D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
53 CHOI Benjamin V V D V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
54 KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. D D V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
55 ZHANG Graham V D D V V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
56 LU Nathan V V D V D V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
57 HOU Gaven D V V V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
58 RUIZ ALMEIDA Muhammad V D D V V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
59 GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) D V V V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
59 BIELER Mason V D V V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
61 VADEN Oliver D V V V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
62 ROZALSKI Eli V V D D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
63 LIU ERIC D D V V D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
64 CHUN Dashel V V D V D D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
65 LEE Charles T D V V V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
66 PARK David D V V V V V D 2.0 5 +3.0
67 TSAY Jordan R. V D D V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
67 PARK Steve (Sangmin) D D V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
69 WONG Jacob W. D V V V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
69 SHAW eric D V V V V D D 1.8 4 +2.2
71 TWEMLOW Sacha V V V D D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
72 CHO Xzander V D V V V D D 3.2 4 +0.8
73 CHANG Eric Jonathan D D V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
74 TULYAG Azim V V D D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
75 LE Jacob H. V D D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
76 KAWADA Sebastien D V V V D D 2.8 3 +0.2
77 CHUANG Oscar V D D V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
78 PAN Edwin D V V D V D 1.5 3 +1.5
79 CHANG Jeremy D V V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
80 CHANG Jonathan D D V V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
81 DANIEL Nikith D V V V D D 1.4 3 +1.6
82 LU Kevin D D V V V D D 3.8 3 -0.8
83 SUAREZ Adrian V V D D V D D 4.1 3 -1.1
84 GERRISH William D D V D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
85 KIM Daniel Y. V V V D D D D 3.9 3 -0.9
86 XIE Jicheng V D D D V V D 3.0 3 -
87 LOZANO Veyron Jericho V D D V D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
87 ZHOU Ryan V V D D D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
89 DOELL Ethan V V D D V D D 3.5 3 -0.5
89 WONG Evan D D D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
91 UHLIG Cole D D D V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
91 LI Richard V D V V D D D 1.9 3 +1.1
91 LING Carson Jr V V D D V D D 2.7 3 +0.3
94 ZHANG Jacob V D V V D D D 1.3 3 +1.7
95 DHOKTE Neev D V V D V D D 3.0 3 -
96 FUKUDA Brando D D V V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
97 WANG Ancen D D V V V D D 2.2 3 +0.8
98 DENG David V V D D D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
99 CHEN Ethan D D D V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
100 WU Thomas V V D D D V D 1.8 3 +1.2
101 ZENG Rick V V D D D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
102 SHEN Oliver D V D V D D 2.7 2 -0.7
103 MO Ethan D V V D D D 2.7 2 -0.7
103 CHEN Hanson V D D V D D 2.2 2 -0.2
105 CHEN Matthew D D V D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
106 XU Nathan D D D V V D 1.4 2 +0.6
107 TOOMRE Kai D V D D D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
108 PARK William D D D V D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
109 DULAI Angad D V D D V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
110 WINGLER Cole D D D D V V D 2.0 2 -
111 YU William D V D D V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
112 PETROV Mikhail D V D V D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
113 GORDON William L. D V V D D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
114 ZHANG Lucas D V V D D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
115 JOHNSON Soren V D V D D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
116 HOWLAND Jonas V D V D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
117 KOE Beckett D D V V D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
118 HUANG Jinyao D V D V D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
119 HE Ian D V V D D D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
120 RODRIGUEZ Tyler D D V D D V D 2.2 1 -1.2
121 WANDJI Noah D D D V D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
122 JIN Andy D V D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
123 ONG Nicholas D V D D D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
124 ALKADI Zain V D D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
125 SUAREZ David V D D D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
126 ELKOUSY Zain al Din D D V D D D V D 2.8 1 -1.8
127 LAO Kevin D D D D V D V D 2.6 1 -1.6
128 LEE Jayden D V D D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
129 KIM Seoheul D V D D V D D 1.3 2 +0.7
130 UPENDER West D V D D D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
131 YU ShiLin (Harry) V D D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
132 CHEN David V D D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
133 HE Bourne V D D D D D 1.0 1 -
134 SUNDSTROM Wren V D D D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
135 HOM Logan D D D D V D 0.5 1 +0.5
136 QIAN Zekai D D V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
137 ZHONG Maxwell D V D D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
138 NI Kevin D D V D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
139 WANG Rory D D V D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
139 MARTIRE Luca D V D D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
141 BLACK Henry V D D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
141 PLUMMER Waylon V D D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
143 LU Alex D D D D V D 4.0 1 -3.0
144 TANG Royce D D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
144 SHANNON Jack D D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
144 WENGER Liam V D D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
147 LIU Robert D D D D D V 1.7 1 -0.7
147 DONOHUE Taylor D V D D D D 3.3 1 -2.3
149 ZHAO Ryan D D D V D D 2.2 1 -1.2
149 MCCONKEY Tristan D V D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
151 POPOKH Luca D D D V D D 0.8 1 +0.2
152 ZHOU Alex D V D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
153 SICAT Justin D D D D V D 1.4 1 -0.4
153 KOE Declan V D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
153 WANG rainier D D V D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
156 KUE Temujin D D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
157 LIANG Ethan D D V D D D 0.5 1 +0.5
158 TACK Everett V D D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
159 HICKEY Connor D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
160 CHAN Joseph D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
161 RUSSELL Paul D D D D D D 3.7 0 -3.7
162 KIM Gene D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
163 YAN Rian D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
164 HUA Aaron D D D D D D 2.5 0 -2.5
165 WEI JR Shan D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
165 SUN Neo D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
167 CHEW Brandon D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
168 O'LEARY Colin D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
168 MCMILLIAN Harrison D D D D D D 3.4 0 -3.4
168 YU ShiYu (Henry) D D D D D D 2.4 0 -2.4
171 ZHANG Hanson D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
172 YUE Jackson D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
172 GOGOI Kavi D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
174 BANUELOS Dario D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
175 SHAW Spencer D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.