Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | BONDARENCO Vlad | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 41% |
2 | KAPOOR Tanmay | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
3 | WEN Edward | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
3 | GONG Jerry | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
5 | MACGREGOR Colin D. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
6 | BROOK Joel | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 6% |
7 | TAUER Sam | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
8 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
9 | HUANG Tom | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
10 | MATERDEY Alexander | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% |
11 | BROGAN Kevin | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 8% |
12 | PANEPINTO HATTORI Fernando | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
13 | COUNTS Nicholas | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
14 | CHENG Brandon | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
15 | KEIPER Benjamin (Ben) | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
16 | LI Yao (Liam) | 1% | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
17 | CARTER Jackson | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 10% |
18 | PEACE Joshua | 15% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
19 | HORAN Daniel J. | 3% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
20 | FISHER Paul C. | 22% | 46% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
21 | FLUECKIGER Michael | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
22 | MARSHALL Jacob | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
23 | ANSARI Umayr | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
24 | PANNOZZO Luca | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
25 | PODDAR Shameek | 2% | 19% | 43% | 28% | 7% | - |
26 | ZISLIN Benjamin | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
27 | JOHNSON Colin | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
28 | AISSIS John G. | 35% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
29 | HE Tony | 13% | 51% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
30 | AVRAMIS Adam | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.