Strength Ranking

Men's Sabre, Birth Year 2008

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Gonzalez, Emilio 3615 3349 42 A25
2 Holz, Daniel 3420 3162 74 A25
3 YAN, RUIWEN 3970 2864 - D24
4 Kwalwasser, Eric 3110 2856 43 A25
5 Primus, Nazir 3030 2776 13 A25
6 Guffey, Christopher 3008 2759 10 A25
7 Ye, Eric 2992 2726 43 A25
8 Su, Landon 2928 2666 2 A25
9 Lee, Noah 2878 2625 12 A25
10 Hu, Christopher 2817 2568 9 A24
11 Kushkov, Daniel 2807 2553 36 B25
12 Bera, Enzo 2802 2549 59 A25
13 Pi, Alexander 2800 2542 - A25
14 Tao, Jeffrey 2760 2509 31 A24
15 Yan, William 2765 2508 52 A25
16 Kalpathy, Rohit 2685 2434 13 B25
17 Yang, Dylan 2607 2357 27 B24
18 Chow, William 2607 2353 8 A25
19 Zhao, Zhiyu 2588 2337 94 A25
20 Li, Yiwei 2573 2322 51 A24
21 Siddiqui, Shayan 2575 2318 34 B25
22 Gong, Jerry 2564 2314 36 A24
23 Ramanan, Jaisimh 2560 2307 32 B25
24 Anand, Rohan 2560 2306 7 B24
25 Sowers, Samuel 2532 2269 - B25
26 Shankwiler, Christopher 2520 2268 37 B25
27 Yerramilli, Tejas 2511 2254 13 B25
28 Katz, Ryan 2502 2252 18 B25
29 Suba, Lucas 2490 2240 139 B25
30 Zhu, Yuchen 2518 2228 27 C25
31 Gerstmann, Max 2479 2224 37 C25
32 Sugiura, Samuel 2466 2218 - C24
33 Kang, Evan 2463 2212 23 B25
34 Ramanan, Govind 2443 2190 6 A23
35 Brandt, Jaden 2443 2187 - B24
36 Diepstra, Jeremy 3259 2174 - E23
37 Chen, Jonathan 2426 2171 3 A25
38 Contractor, Cyrus 2425 2167 12 B25
39 Guan, Dennis 2439 2150 14 D24
40 Laub, William 2395 2140 97 A25
41 Hublall, Ethan 2402 2134 32 C24
42 Shipitsin, Alexander 2389 2133 20 B25
43 Lee, Aidan Jared Marcus 3061 2107 - A25
44 Wang, Weiyun 2359 2101 3 B25
45 Tsao, Oliver 2321 2067 67 C25
46 Sage, Sebastian 2349 2054 17 B25
47 Lin, Felix 2305 2046 22 C25
48 Chen, Samuel 2302 2024 - B25
49 Eybelman, Ariel 2280 2021 57 B24
50 Tiagi, George 2279 2021 22 C25
51 Chen, Jeffrey 2405 2013 23 D25
52 Kong, Alan 2398 2010 - E24
53 Aydogdu, Hakan 2308 2009 70 C25
54 Hung, Samuel 2264 2007 15 C24

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.