| Rank | Name | Strength |
Conservative Estimate* Cons. Est.* |
180-day Trend |
Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Xiao, julie | 3182 | 2923 | 65 | A25 |
| 2 | Tsui, Natalie | 3169 | 2915 | 107 | A25 |
| 3 | McKee, Brynnley | 3086 | 2831 | 126 | A25 |
| 4 | So, Catelyn | 2845 | 2591 | 11 | A25 |
| 5 | Tabangay, Heartlyn | 2837 | 2578 | 22 | A24 |
| 6 | Shi, Julia | 2852 | 2575 | 127 | A24 |
| 7 | Tse, Angelina | 2822 | 2563 | 34 | A25 |
| 8 | Lauri, Keira | 2737 | 2477 | 230 | A24 |
| 9 | Jeong, Katie | 2706 | 2453 | 27 | A24 |
| 10 | Wang, Gloria Ruoyan | 2734 | 2445 | 21 | A24 |
| 11 | Lim, Jaslene | 2684 | 2430 | 53 | A24 |
| 12 | Mund, Ruth | 2660 | 2405 | - | B24 |
| 13 | Maklin, Sofia | 2624 | 2367 | 42 | A24 |
| 14 | Liu, Sydney | 2607 | 2358 | 11 | B24 |
| 15 | Lin, Nicole | 2582 | 2318 | 37 | A23 |
| 16 | Mann, Sophia | 2560 | 2308 | 24 | B25 |
| 17 | Attia, Jasmine | 2547 | 2291 | 134 | A25 |
| 18 | Kohlberger, Noelle | 2732 | 2280 | - | E24 |
| 19 | Kondev, Elizabeth | 2509 | 2250 | 15 | A23 |
| 20 | KOUROUSI, ANNA KALLIOPI | 2887 | 2220 | - | A24 |
| 21 | Yam, Danika | 2464 | 2205 | 67 | C24 |
| 22 | Pabian, Emilia | 2453 | 2189 | 7 | B23 |
| 23 | Huchwajda, Pola | 2580 | 2189 | 36 | C23 |
| 24 | Spears, Mya B | 2430 | 2172 | 48 | C25 |
| 25 | Dong, Angel | 2434 | 2167 | 48 | B25 |
| 26 | Huang, Rachael | 2425 | 2167 | 11 | B24 |
| 27 | Dang, Kelia | 2422 | 2160 | 1 | C25 |
| 28 | zhang, Chenfei | 2425 | 2154 | 23 | B24 |
| 29 | Buhay, Kirsten | 2402 | 2148 | 45 | C23 |
| 30 | Chen, Kevy | 2381 | 2124 | 8 | D23 |
| 31 | Zoller, Noelle | 2373 | 2112 | 78 | A25 |
| 32 | Yu, Holly | 2405 | 2103 | 5 | B23 |
| 33 | Tan, Adelyn | 2348 | 2090 | 38 | C24 |
| 34 | Guven, Coco | 2323 | 2072 | 8 | B24 |
| 35 | Medvinsky, Alexandra | 2321 | 2061 | 5 | C24 |
| 36 | NAMBIAR, GEETA MAHESH | 2952 | 2042 | 189 | E24 |
| 37 | Schaible, Sofia | 2288 | 2038 | 65 | C24 |
| 38 | Xie, Nora | 2293 | 2031 | 142 | B24 |
| 39 | Chung, Hailey | 2478 | 2021 | 31 | C24 |
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.