Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | BENNETT Olivia | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
2 | HOPKINS Leila | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 43% | 17% |
3 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | 1% | 7% | 32% | 46% | 14% | |
3 | CONNOLLY Natasha | 8% | 36% | 41% | 13% | 1% | |
5 | HUANG Ziyan | 4% | 28% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - |
6 | ETZEL Rowan | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
7 | SIU Maple | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 12% | |
8 | JENSEN MJ | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
9 | PERALTA-VIRTUE Tamsen | - | - | 4% | 35% | 61% | |
10 | MASTRONARDI Laura | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 29% |
11 | DAGLI Niara | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | |
12 | ERSHOVA Anastasia | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
13 | BUSH-NICKERSON Haley | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 28% | 5% |
14 | MUELLER Nancy | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | |
15 | MILLARD Lily C. | < 1% | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 17% |
16 | SAMMON-BURNS Sylvia | 22% | 47% | 25% | 5% | - | |
17 | RABIDOUX Skyler L. | 8% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - |
18 | SONG Jaeyi | 9% | 41% | 39% | 10% | - | |
19 | COVINO Mila | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
20 | TIBBETTS Lily | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
21 | CARON-MCCAIN Kate | 5% | 39% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - |
22 | FARLEKAS Noradeen | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.