Epee Miami Fencing Club - Miami, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PINERO Jose | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
2 | THAYER Jake | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 43% | 43% |
3 | GARCES Alan | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% |
3 | THAYER Bryce | - | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
6 | BUYANOV Nikita | - | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% |
7 | MARIN John Lucas | 2% | 17% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
8 | ROMERO KURI Alexander | - | 1% | 13% | 41% | 39% | 5% | - |
9 | HANDBERG Paul | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 8% |
10 | JELEV Mario | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 44% | 17% |
11 | LOPEZ Andres | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
12 | HERNáNDEZ Leandros | 1% | 11% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 1% | - |
13 | PEREZ Alpacino | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
14 | BRETON Jayden | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
15 | CHENG Ava | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
16 | CHENG Thomas | - | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
17 | ALONSO Vinicius | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
18 | HERRERA-ULASHKEVICH Cristobal | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
19 | EDWARDS Tim | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
20 | MARSI Mattia | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
21 | ROMERO KURI Celeste | 1% | 11% | 39% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
22 | GOLDSON Tyrese | 3% | 43% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
23 | FERNLUND Helen | 21% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
24 | LIU Kevin | 35% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
25 | BLYDEN Jordan | 25% | 45% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
26 | TURNER Dillon | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
27 | LIU Nick | 79% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
28 | STRACHMAN Leah | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.