Forge Fencing Academy & Club - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | EDWARDS Auprell | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% | |
| 2 | MILEWSKI Nicole | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 35% | 59% |
| 3 | ZHAO Ivy | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% | |
| 3 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
| 5 | ZHU Serene M. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% | |
| 6 | BYBEE Lucy J. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 33% | 43% | 11% |
| 7 | DONGES Anna | 1% | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 8 | ALEXANDER Amelia | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 5% | |
| 9 | MAGALSKI Mary | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 10 | RHEINECKER Claire | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 11 | PLAZA-GASALLA Gloria | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 12 | KUMAR Anusha | 1% | 12% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
| 13 | KEE Bea Isabelle | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 14 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 15 | LOUGHLIN Ariana | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | |
| 16 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 17 | NEELAM Neha | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 1% | |
| 18 | DILLE Carolina G. | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 12% | |
| 19 | NIEMAN Anjolie | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | VICKERMAN Eva | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | HABER Emily | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 22 | RHEINECKER Eleanora Grace | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | GOSART Hailee | 35% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 24 | RASMUSSEN Annika | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 25 | GABAY Catherine | 9% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.