Junior Olympic Championships

Cadet Men's Saber

Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 DHINGRA Gian K. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 57%
2 MAKLIN Edward P. 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 37% 6%
3 SIMAK Joseph P. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 32%
3 KOGAN Benjamin 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 22%
5 JI Cody Walter 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 37%
6 WU Mengke 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 44%
7 WILSON Jude 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 61% 17%
8 ERMAKOV Lev 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 58% 17%
9 BERMAN Luca 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 14%
10 KIM Shaun M. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 26%
11 CHOI Silas 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 34% 7%
12 LIANG Connor 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 58%
13 SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 67%
14 YUN Jaesun 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 45%
15 MORALES Jonathan 100% 99% 92% 70% 35% 9% 1%
16 HOLZ William A. 100% 100% 99% 84% 48% 13% 1%
17 FERNANDEZ Rodrigo 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 42%
18 DENG Andrew 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 37% 6%
19 NAZLYMOV Andrei 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 44% 11%
19 YUN Jake 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 17%
21 SO Hananiah 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 42%
22 SWORDS Evan F. 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 29% 5%
23 GHAYALOD ansh 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 20%
24 MORRILL William 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 56%
25 MARGULIES William 100% 100% 96% 78% 42% 10%
26 BERRIO Carter E. 100% 100% 99% 95% 77% 42% 11%
27 SHIRPAL Oleksandr 100% 100% 100% 95% 78% 44% 12%
28 SHOMAN Zachary 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 53% 13%
29 CHEONG Heonjae 100% 100% 99% 93% 73% 37% 8%
30 OH Triton 100% 100% 97% 78% 39% 10% 1%
31 HJERPE Wade H. 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 36% 7%
32 CHAN Matthew 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 39%
33 HONG Vincent Q. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 22%
34 TANN Justin 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 54% 17%
35 YANG Ziyi 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 17%
35 XU William 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 24%
37 POPE Nico 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 12%
38 HAN Daniel Y. 100% 100% 99% 89% 61% 20%
39 ZUBATIY Samuel 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 11%
40 ZHENG Edward L. 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 43% 7%
41 LINSKY Matthew 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 53%
41 SHOMAN Noah 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 23% 4%
43 WANG Eric Y. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 72% 28%
44 DU Gavin J. 100% 100% 100% 96% 75% 34% 4%
45 NOBLE Colin 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 19%
46 JIANG Anthony 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 74% 32%
47 PAN Alex 100% 97% 80% 47% 16% 3% -
48 LEE Aydan J. 100% 100% 98% 85% 48% 11%
49 HOLZ Daniel 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 25%
50 GREENBAUM Ian L. 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 15%
51 KIM Alexander M. 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 16%
52 BUCHMANN Finn D. 100% 100% 100% 94% 72% 35% 7%
53 FENG Leo 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 58% 17%
54 MICLAUS Justin 100% 100% 97% 85% 56% 21% 3%
55 ZHOU Miles 100% 100% 100% 94% 65% 24% 3%
56 CHEONG Heonjun 100% 100% 97% 84% 55% 22% 4%
57 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. 100% 99% 93% 70% 35% 10% 1%
58 LUTHRA Arjun 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 34% 7%
59 LIM William J. 100% 100% 95% 77% 44% 14% 2%
60 OVERDECK Andrew 100% 100% 97% 79% 41% 10% 1%
61 HONG Steven 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 4%
62 KIM Matthew 100% 100% 95% 77% 44% 14% 2%
63 GOLDMAN Noah R. 100% 99% 93% 70% 36% 9% 1%
64 QIU Nathan 100% 100% 98% 84% 52% 18% 3%
65 TONG ZACHARY 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 26%
66 COLE Alexander 100% 99% 87% 55% 20% 3%
67 STURN Oliver 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 29% 5%
68 PATIL Aaryan A. 100% 100% 99% 87% 53% 16% 1%
69 CHANG Colin S. 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 23% 3%
70 LIN Daniel 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 36% 8%
71 AVAKIAN Alec 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 48% 12%
72 SANDERS Samuel B. 100% 99% 94% 74% 40% 11% 1%
73 CADAMBI Roshan 100% 100% 100% 95% 71% 31% 5%
74 MCCARTHY Gabriel 100% 99% 92% 70% 36% 11% 1%
75 LEE Justin 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 26%
76 WANG Nicolas 100% 100% 94% 68% 27% 4%
77 SINGH Angadh 100% 99% 89% 57% 20% 3%
78 BONIFIELD Arthur G. 100% 100% 98% 86% 57% 23% 4%
79 STONE Esmond A. 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 24% 4%
80 PI Alexander 100% 98% 84% 51% 18% 3% -
81 WANG Robert 100% 99% 93% 72% 37% 10% 1%
82 BULL Anderson 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 38% 7%
82 THORNHILL Kwasi 100% 100% 97% 84% 51% 17% 2%
84 BABAYEV Gabriel A. 100% 100% 100% 96% 82% 49% 14%
84 KILGALLEN William 100% 99% 94% 72% 36% 9% 1%
84 WONG Ryan 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 24% 4%
87 ZENG Noah 100% 100% 99% 89% 62% 25% 3%
87 KROON Lucas 100% 100% 97% 84% 51% 16% 2%
89 ZHU Charlie 100% 98% 84% 49% 15% 2% -
90 WU Wilmund 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 14% 2%
90 HU Christopher 100% 100% 95% 66% 26% 5% -
92 RHEE Ethan N. 100% 100% 96% 74% 38% 11% 1%
93 DOLAN Charles R. 100% 99% 92% 68% 34% 9% 1%
94 LU Caleb Q. 100% 99% 88% 59% 25% 6% 1%
94 CHTERENTAL Alex 100% 100% 97% 80% 42% 11% 1%
96 NG Jeremiah 100% 100% 96% 75% 37% 9% 1%
97 ZHOU Aeres Z. 100% 100% 99% 90% 55% 17% 2%
98 CHEN Evan P. 100% 99% 94% 76% 42% 12% 1%
99 HOUTZ Jackson 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 15%
100 TAO Jeffrey 100% 98% 83% 50% 17% 2%
101 YOU Jaden 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2%
102 MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu 100% 99% 92% 70% 35% 10% 1%
103 HUANG Ethan F. 100% 100% 100% 97% 86% 55% 17%
104 ROSBERG Dashiell W. 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 39% 9%
105 KUSHKOV Veniamin 100% 100% 98% 84% 49% 14% 1%
106 GHENEA George Philipe 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 21% 3%
106 DUDNICK Christian 100% 94% 64% 23% 3% - -
108 ORIATTI-BRUNS Vincent M. 100% 97% 79% 44% 14% 2% -
109 YANG Dylan 100% 99% 88% 61% 28% 7% 1%
110 LO Andrew T. 100% 93% 66% 30% 8% 1% -
111 JEFFRY Nicholas B. 100% 99% 93% 70% 35% 10% 1%
112 KIBBAR Tomer L. 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 23% 3%
113 BEITEL Noah 100% 100% 94% 73% 36% 8%
114 DENNER Maximilian P. 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 17%
115 GLOZMAN Justin 100% 99% 88% 55% 19% 3%
116 SHAHZAD Azlan A. 100% 90% 57% 21% 4% -
117 LINDHOLM Oliver S. 100% 100% 98% 83% 49% 15% 2%
118 LO Konnor 100% 99% 93% 72% 36% 10% 1%
119 CAISSE Simon B. 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 4% -
120 PIWOWAR Alex 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 20% 3%
121 KALPATHY Rohit 100% 97% 82% 51% 20% 4% -
122 KILARI Krish 100% 96% 74% 37% 11% 2% -
123 EICHHORN Lukas H. 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 42% 9%
124 WAXLER Seth B. 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 14% 2%
125 WU Richard 100% 93% 64% 27% 7% 1% -
126 SU Landon 100% 95% 74% 40% 13% 2% -
127 GAO Marcus 100% 90% 49% 10% 1% - -
128 NIETO Titus P. 100% 88% 50% 13% 2% - -
129 BYON Adrian 100% 97% 81% 49% 18% 3% -
130 XU Andrew 100% 100% 97% 85% 56% 22% 4%
131 CHON Taylor A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 27%
132 ENGEL Peter 100% 97% 78% 40% 10% 1% -
133 LIU Mingyang Ryan 100% 97% 81% 48% 16% 2%
134 GUAN Luke 100% 99% 91% 65% 29% 5%
135 RAJAN Advait 100% 85% 46% 13% 2% -
136 PANDEY Neil 100% 100% 95% 77% 44% 14% 2%
137 HAN Edward 100% 98% 83% 49% 16% 3% -
138 ROE Finnegan 100% 85% 48% 15% 3% - -
139 XUE ALEXANDER 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 38% 8%
140 WEBER Mattias A. 100% 95% 73% 38% 12% 2% -
141 KUSHKOV Daniel 100% 99% 85% 54% 21% 4% -
142 FLOT Tai A. 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 25% 4%
143 LI Yiwei 100% 97% 82% 48% 17% 3% -
144 DEKA Tanush 100% 91% 62% 27% 7% 1% -
145 SUN Ziyao 100% 67% 24% 4% - - -
146 ZHANG Ethan W. 100% 96% 76% 39% 11% 1%
147 KUMAR Sachit 100% 97% 79% 44% 14% 2%
148 ZHANG Derek 100% 99% 89% 60% 24% 4%
149 LO Bradley 100% 88% 41% 9% 1% -
150 MAY Griffin M. 100% 99% 89% 54% 16% 2%
151 LOPEZ Lucas M. 100% 95% 73% 38% 11% 2% -
152 SCHERER Max 100% 99% 94% 75% 41% 12% 1%
153 SAVOY Luca 100% 100% 93% 64% 25% 4% -
154 LO Andrew 100% 56% 12% 1% - - -
155 VENU Ram 100% 90% 58% 22% 4% - -
155 STERN Tobias 100% 77% 38% 11% 2% - -
157 RAMANAN Jaisimh 100% 94% 72% 37% 11% 2% -
158 HUANG Connor 100% 95% 73% 38% 12% 2% -
159 RADY-PENTEK Charles A. 100% 99% 89% 57% 18% 2% -
160 ATANASSOV Vasil V. 100% 100% 98% 89% 63% 27% 4%
160 GRATHWOL-SEAR Oliver 100% 96% 78% 43% 14% 2% -
160 GUFFEY Christopher 100% 95% 62% 18% 2% - -
163 KASPER Aaron 100% 100% 93% 62% 23% 4% -
164 GOLD Carter 100% 88% 55% 21% 4% - -
165 BRAKEY Ryan 100% 67% 16% 2% - - -
166 HUROWITZ Max 100% 91% 62% 25% 6% 1% -
167 MONSON Eli 100% 33% 4% - - - -
168 ZHUANG Rayken 100% 84% 48% 16% 3% - -
168 LUHAN Zachary 100% 31% 3% - - - -
170 GONG Jerry 100% 96% 73% 37% 11% 2% -
171 CHIN Avery 100% 62% 19% 3% - - -
172 HUSTON Theodore 100% 57% 11% 1% - - -
173 SHI Erick 100% 62% 20% 3% - -
174 YOUSSEF David 100% 94% 63% 24% 5% -
175 GOLDIN Lucca 100% 86% 49% 16% 3% - -
176 BAE Jason I. 100% 100% 98% 79% 40% 10% 1%
176 BOSITA Carson 100% 96% 76% 39% 11% 1% -
178 DEPEW Spencer 100% 98% 82% 49% 17% 3% -
179 MAHAPATRA SAMARTH 100% 99% 86% 46% 14% 2% -
180 VOSS Jeffer 100% 93% 65% 27% 6% 1% -
181 JAIN Aniket 100% 87% 50% 15% 2% - -
182 KAUFMAN Wyatt J. 100% 92% 62% 25% 6% 1% -
183 CHEN Lohen 100% 93% 62% 23% 4% - -
184 TSAI Michael T. 100% 45% 10% 1% - - -
185 HOUTZ Mitchell B. 100% 76% 36% 10% 1% - -
185 FOWBLE Chance 100% 77% 25% 4% - - -
187 ZHOU James Y. 100% 78% 37% 9% 1% - -
187 CUNNINGHAM-SNELSON Aahil 100% 69% 28% 6% 1% - -
187 AKS Ari 100% 90% 54% 19% 4% - -
187 RAMANAN Govind 100% 82% 43% 13% 2% - -
187 RAMTEKKAR Soham 100% 80% 40% 11% 1% - -
192 DILLE Jackson K. 100% 94% 71% 35% 10% 2% -
193 CHAN Aidan 100% 86% 52% 19% 4% - -
194 LAM Ethan 100% 93% 48% 12% 1% - -
195 BRUTUS Caleb 100% 100% 97% 83% 54% 21% 3%
196 HOOLE Colson 100% 75% 34% 9% 1% -
197 MOULTON Ian 100% 70% 27% 6% 1% -
198 KERCHER Alexander 100% 92% 58% 19% 3% - -
199 BONDARENCO Vlad 100% 93% 63% 26% 6% -
200 WALKE Devin 100% 69% 27% 5% 1% -
201 TASIKAS Stylianos 100% 93% 66% 30% 8% 1% -
202 MCCARTHY Devan 100% 86% 51% 19% 4% - -
203 VELTZ Tyler J. 100% 39% 6% - - -
204 FAYETTE Julien 100% 40% 6% - - -
205 SHANKAR Karthik 100% 83% 43% 12% 2% - -
205 MISHRA Aadi 100% 54% 14% 2% - - -
205 JORGESON Charlie 100% 56% 15% 2% - - -
205 WILKINSON James 100% 68% 26% 6% 1% - -
209 BYON Julian 100% 86% 51% 18% 4% - -
210 MCCLUNG Gavin 100% 92% 50% 15% 2% - -
210 JOHNSON Kai 100% 22% 2% - - - -
212 YERRAMILLI Tejas 100% 90% 44% 10% 1% - -
212 FARAON Paulus 100% 57% 17% 3% - - -
214 SONI Nikhil 100% 69% 25% 5% - - -
214 POFF Kainoa 100% 71% 19% 2% - - -
214 CUELLAR Hugo 100% 50% 9% 1% - - -
217 NETHERTON Jack 100% 41% 6% - - - -
218 PATNAIK Eshaan 100% 84% 44% 11% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.