Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 2 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 3 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% |
| 3 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 5 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
| 6 | KRASTEV Minna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 7 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 8 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% |
| 9 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 62% |
| 10 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 3% |
| 11 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 12 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% |
| 13 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 15% | |
| 14 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 15 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 16 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% |
| 17 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 18 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 12% |
| 19 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 20 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
| 21 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 22 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
| 23 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 24 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 25 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 98% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 26 | JOHNSON Lydia | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 27 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
| 28 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
| 29 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
| 30 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 12% |
| 32 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% |
| 34 | DANK Dina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 9% |
| 35 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 13% |
| 36 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
| 37 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 5% |
| 38 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 9% |
| 39 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 39 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 41 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% |
| 42 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
| 43 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 44 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% |
| 45 | LU Amy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
| 46 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 47 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 9% |
| 48 | GRULICH Rayaana | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 49 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
| 50 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 51 | JOHNSTON Lily | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 52 | HU Michelle | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 53 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% | |
| 54 | WEI JoyAnn | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 55 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 3% |
| 56 | TSE Angelina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 57 | EVANS Madelynn | 100% | 97% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | YANG Angelina LeLe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
| 59 | HUNG Anna | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 60 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 60 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 62 | WANG Zidan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 63 | LIM Jovine | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 64 | NAYAK Indra | 100% | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 65 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
| 66 | SZETO Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
| 67 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 68 | SPRINGER Ella | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 69 | XU Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% |
| 70 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | < 1% | - |
| 71 | ADAMS Morrigan B. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 72 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 7% |
| 73 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 74 | YANG Lea | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 75 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 76 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 77 | WHITESIDES Abigail E. | 100% | 92% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 78 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 79 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 8% | |
| 80 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
| 81 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
| 82 | BROCK Sydney | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 83 | LUKER Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 84 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | - |
| 85 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
| 86 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 100% | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 87 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 88 | CHIN Elise | 100% | 99% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 89 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 90 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 100% | 96% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | FANG sophie | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 92 | ZENG Megan | 100% | 100% | 89% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 92 | HUANG MADELINE | 100% | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 94 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 95 | LIM Jaslene | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 96 | FAN Grace | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 97 | TUNG Renee | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 98 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 99 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 100 | FERREIRA Alejandra E. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 101 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
| 102 | LIN Nicole | 100% | 99% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 103 | CHO Michelle | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 104 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
| 105 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 106 | HURST Kennedy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 2% |
| 106 | CHANG Audrey | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 108 | MORAN Rhea | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 108 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
| 110 | DAVIS Jayna M. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 111 | TODD Phoebe | 100% | 97% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 112 | DENG Brooke | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 113 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 114 | HENRY Soraya S. | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 115 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 116 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | 100% | 86% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 117 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 88% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 118 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 119 | CHEN Kevy | 100% | 97% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 120 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 121 | ALTIRS Kate | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 122 | PYO Penelope E. | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 123 | CHEN Athena | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 124 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 125 | ZOLLER Noelle | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 126 | LEE Lauren | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 126 | WALKER ZaNiya | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 128 | SCHOEW Margot | 100% | 79% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 129 | SCOTT Eve | 100% | 88% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 130 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 95% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 130 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 132 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 133 | CARTER Keely | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 134 | BARTON Mele | 100% | 97% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 135 | DIECK Miranda P. | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 136 | PANIGRAHI Emersen | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 137 | HOLMES Sabrina | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 137 | HAJEEBU Sreehita | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 139 | DEANGELO Annabelle | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 140 | BARRIE Sadie Q. | 100% | 82% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 141 | LIN Lauren | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 141 | MEHTA Mary | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 143 | DUDNICK Morgan | 100% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 143 | NEWMARK Ellie | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 145 | REGANTI Sitara | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 145 | SOWERS Lia | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 145 | IYER Arushi | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 145 | BRAMMER-GONZALES Xiomara | 100% | 4% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 149 | NEELEY Leilani | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 150 | SHAPONA Lillian | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 151 | BENZ Addison | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 152 | FAYETTE Mathilde | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.