January NAC

Veteran 60-69 Men’s Saber (V60MS)

Saturday, January 6, 2024 at 4:00 PM

Register

San Jose McEnery Convention Center - San Jose, CA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3505 3949 - 3156
5 - 8 2951 3166 - 2835
9 - 16 2595 2963 - 2099
17 - 27 1893 2289 - 1337

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lundborg, Mark Washington Fencing Academy A23 3949 3518.38
2 Matt, Chris Capital Fencing Academy A23 3438 3149.10
3 Runyan, Joshua Spartak A22 3477 3082.61
4 Dashnaw, Stephen Lilov Fencing Academy B23 3156 2830.07
5 Vidovszky, Tamas Premier Fencing Academy A22 3166 2721.29
6 Heck, Steven Nazlymov Fencing Foundation B23 2933 2545.16
7 Bukowski, Todd Nazlymov Fencing Foundation B23 2835 2470.84
8 Herrera, Richard PDX Fencing B22 2870 2454.12
9 Milne, Will Peninsula Fencing Academy C21 2963 2371.66
10 Anthony, Donald The Ohio State University NCAA C21 2916 2305.38
11 Gueble, Jeffrey Infinity Fencing Alliance B21 2726 2302.43
12 Lear, Donald Southwest Florida Fencing Academy D23 2666 2222.37
13 Srere, Mark Capital Fencing Academy C23 2547 2080.60
14 Krasnich, Mike Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C23 2561 2047.18
15 Hicha, Paul Arizona State University Fencing Club C23 2282 1899.10
16 creten, joachim Oregon Fencing Alliance B22 2099 1757.17
17 Dahl, Chris Fencing Academy Of Boston D23 2072 1743.17
18 Mighell, Jason Denver Fencing Center E21 2074 1686.72
19 Blair, Ray Naples Fencing Academy U 2109 1656.89
20 Chambers, Thomas Infinity Fencing Alliance C23 1947 1494.54
21 Zinni, Gene Fencing Academy Of Denver U 1902 1343.57
22 Su, Ji Miracle Fencing Club U 1732 1325.39
23 Lin, Feng U 2289 1198.55
24 Treanor, Donald Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1658 850.64
25 Bruce, Ommer Unattached U 1337 451.48
26 Richards, Dick DC Fencers Club U 2139 109.24
27 Olson, Mark No Fear Fencing U 1562 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!