Miami University - Oxford, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHAO Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
| 2 | MCOWEN Peter D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 27% |
| 3 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 3 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 5 | BLAKEMAN Michael J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 7% | |
| 6 | WEATHERINGTON Jude A. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 7 | GNEUHS Sam | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 8 | BALBUS Glenn H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 87% | |
| 9 | DENMAN Kirsten S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | |
| 10 | RESS Michael A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 11 | MCLANE Katherine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 11 | BLACKLEDGE Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
| 13 | DENMAN Matthew L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% | |
| 14 | CENTOFANTI Anthony | 100% | 91% | 55% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | MCCALLEN Cade | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 16 | MARTIN Maximilian | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 7% | - | |
| 17 | BISWAS Aneel | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | - | |
| 18 | FISHER Racheal | 100% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 19 | SMITH Brandon T. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 20 | RYAN Ben | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | MEFFORD Mitchell | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 22 | AGUILAR Nicolas F. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | HABEGGER Alexander | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 24 | MOHR Aaron | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | LATHAN Kallan | 100% | 95% | 65% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 26 | BOWERS Gregory | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 19% | 2% | |
| 27 | DUWEL Samuel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | - |
| 28 | KIM John | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 29 | HUBBARD Aiden | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | WEADICK Michael | 100% | 95% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | ABRAHAMSON Emma | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 32 | WEADICK Nick | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.