Morris Knolls High School - Rockaway, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LILOV Neil Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 2 | DENG Andrew | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 | |
| 3 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 4 | TRUDNOS Allen Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 5 | HUANG Ethan | D V V | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 | |
| 6 | DEPEW Spencer | D V | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 | |
| 7 | SHTEYN Mark | V D V V | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 | |
| 8 | DAGRACA Aiden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | ZHENG Edward | V D V | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 | |
| 10 | CHEN Evan | V V | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 | |
| 11 | NG Jeremiah | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 | |
| 11 | MARGULIES William | V | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 | |
| 13 | HUANG Tyler Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | FLOT Tai | V | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 | |
| 15 | ZENG Noah | V D V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 | |
| 16 | ZHOU Grant | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | O'KEEFE Mitchell Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan | V V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 | |
| 19 | PANDEY Neil | V V D V | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 | |
| 20 | STAMIS Kyle | D D V D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 | |
| 21 | GIRALT Benjamin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | KIMBERLIN Christopher Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | ZELAYA Jayson Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | CHO Philip Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | KIM Matthew | D V D D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 | |
| 26 | CHABOT Michael Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | MANCUSO Michael Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | ROETMAN Christopher Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | WISCHUSEN Kai Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | KREGER Evan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | KOGAN Nikita | D D D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 | |
| 32 | ROHATAGI Shreyan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | CHONG Joshua Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | SRIRAM Rithvik Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | KWON Ryan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | TANG Adam Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | LASKOW Oliver | D D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 | |
| 38 | PADALKAR Kedar Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | MORAN Jake Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | ORSINI Jaedan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.