Fencing Center of Chicago RYC & RJCC

Youth 10 Men’s Epee (Y10ME)

Saturday, April 20, 2024 at 4:00 PM

Register

Energy Sport Club - Niles, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1768 1929 - 1610
5 - 8 1647 1831 - 1355
9 - 16 1329 1713 - 1142
17 - 23 1155 1586 - 670

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Mberia, Henry Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1764 1442.04
2 Talandzevicius, Tomas Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1771 1437.82
3 Liu, Maximilian Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1929 1408.31
4 Duchnowski, Thiesson Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1610 1209.07
5 Pagliarini, James Escrime Du Lac U 1721 1205.48
6 Kravchenko, Philip Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1355 898.50
7 Kurtovic, Kaim Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1682 896.41
8 Dierking, Cameron Peoria Fencing Academy U 1831 782.71
9 Allam, Yousuf Advance Fencing U 1611 722.17
10 Nocon, Garrison Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1319 680.09
11 Kiciman, Louis Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1142 594.93
12 Barnett, Edward Advance Fencing U 1713 579.29
13 Buono, Antonino Illinois Fencing Academy U 1297 544.24
14 Lim, Cayden Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1194 459.14
15 Mirza, Arrustu Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1158 452.55
16 Ketcham, Conrad Escrime Du Lac U 1197 238.20
17 Green, Hudson Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 910 41.40
18 Berkovits, Damon Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 944 11.45
19 Hilfiger, Marcos Escrime Du Lac U 1005 10.15
20 Lytle, Cole Escrime Du Lac U 1421 < 0
21 Lorince, Ivar Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1547 < 0
22 An, Jacob Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1586 < 0
23 Abezgauz, Ariel Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 670 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!