Cherry Blossom ROC

Division IA Men’s Saber (D1AMS)

Saturday, April 13, 2024 at 1:00 PM

Register

University of Maryland, Reckord Armory - College Park, MD

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3168 3419 - 2925
5 - 8 2827 3058 - 2652
9 - 16 2614 2882 - 2433
17 - 32 2245 2455 - 1894
33 - 56 1820 2462 - 1063

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Matt, Chris Capital Fencing Academy A23 3419 3094.55
2 Jeffords, Alexander South Bay Fencing Academy A24 3347 3090.22
3 Wang, Charles Axis Fencing Club A22 2982 2689.77
4 Chin, Matthew Miracle Fencing Club A21 2925 2663.87
5 Cortez, Christopher Integrity Fencing Studio B23 2845 2553.09
6 Fenker, William Miracle Fencing Club C23 2752 2394.15
7 Patel, Rayn Capital Fencing Academy B24 2652 2389.41
8 Ferraro, Pietro Capital Fencing Academy B22 3058 2363.44
9 Yan, William Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C24 2609 2343.94
10 Chung, Connor Tim Morehouse Fencing Club B23 2594 2343.19
11 Yang, Dylan Premier Fencing Academy C23 2585 2330.98
12 Ferrara, Nicholas Capital Fencing Academy B23 2836 2286.28
13 Feldman, Drew Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA C23 2535 2280.05
14 Jones, Graham Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C24 2882 2247.39
15 Deck, Tyson Forge Fencing Teams B24 2441 2184.56
16 Riggins, Littleton Salle Auriol Seattle C23 2433 2155.65
17 Huang, Zekai Salle Auriol Seattle C23 2397 2093.71
18 Hotha, Nikhil Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C24 2376 2093.07
19 Baker, Keith Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C20 2409 2082.41
20 Chen, Jonathan Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy C24 2331 2069.90
21 Posy, Daniel Bergen Fencing Club C23 2279 2015.04
22 Stamis, Kyle Durkan Fencing Academy C24 2261 1943.86
23 Bridgeman, Andrew Capital Fencing Academy C24 2455 1932.98
24 Lin, Felix Miracle Fencing Club C24 2197 1927.80
25 Notopradono, Nicholas Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy D24 2140 1875.01
26 Jensby, Jason Nova Fencing Club D24 2204 1870.30
27 McCarthy, Devan Long Island Fencing Center E24 2184 1842.29
28 Robles, Julio Capital Fencing Academy D24 2452 1820.66
29 wang, Max Capital Fencing Academy E24 2024 1756.58
30 Clark, Keagan Miracle Fencing Club D22 2110 1744.66
31 Luan, Mark Unattached E24 2213 1602.29
32 Feng, Brendan Miracle Fencing Club E23 1894 1584.11
33 Valencia, Jose Capital Fencing Academy D24 1927 1576.24
34 Shimer, Joseph Liberty Fencing Club LLC U 2187 1527.26
35 Rehm, Liam Nazlymov Fencing Foundation E23 1878 1522.43
36 Shankar, Karthik Capital Fencing Academy D24 1893 1504.33
37 Crain, Bennett Forge Fencing Teams E23 1901 1501.41
38 Markowitz, Jonathan Nova Fencing Club E24 1862 1478.88
39 Rose, Colin Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. U 2193 1449.25
40 Klebs, Robert Royal Fencing Academy D20 1896 1439.57
41 cai, fungyu Capital Fencing Academy U 1857 1396.13
42 Benson, Jacob Nova Fencing Club E24 1853 1394.44
43 Elder, John Nazlymov Fencing Foundation D23 1943 1389.57
44 Parcell, Colby Miracle Fencing Club D24 1712 1315.18
45 Strucker, Rocco Capital Fencing Academy U 1731 1260.50
46 Szulim, Lucjan Capital Fencing Academy U 1653 1237.71
47 Lemery, Marc Capital Fencing Academy E24 1680 1185.67
48 Vlasenko, Bohdan Nova Fencing Club E24 1870 1153.53
49 Lichterman, Jakub Capital Fencing Academy D24 1568 1090.20
50 Filatov, Aleksandr Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 2462 1087.87
51 Ho, Alex Nova Fencing Club U 1522 397.59
52 Mills, Matthew Capital Fencing Academy E23 1350 331.66
53 Roorda, Easton Nova Fencing Club U 1063 172.12
54 Mishulovich, Ronen Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. U 2086 105.13
55 Varner, Michael Capital Fencing Academy U 1924 40.79
56 Mills, Henry Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1681 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!