New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | MEHAN Nicholas | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 80% |
2 | KIM Ethan | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
3 | BONETTI Brayden | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 31% |
3 | ZHAO Lucas | - | - | 1% | 14% | 44% | 40% |
5 | FADEL Alexander | - | - | 5% | 30% | 47% | 18% |
6 | PINTO Marcus | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
7 | DOMINIQUE Remson | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
8 | KIETLINSKI Samuel | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
9 | ALAVE Kyle | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
10 | RAJMOHAN Arya | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
11 | HUCHWAJDA Alex | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 3% |
12 | DEELY Hartigan | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
13 | OH Aster | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 35% | 8% |
14 | NG Jonathan | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 7% |
15 | DOSTAL Maximilian | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
16 | DAI Zihou | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 2% |
17 | BALE ATMAN | 8% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - |
18 | YOOK Isaac | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | - |
19 | LOO Jason | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
20 | LIU Ryan | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
21 | KENNEDY Tomás | 6% | 31% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - |
22 | SONG Aidan | 22% | 48% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
23 | GOMEZ Emilio | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
24 | LIN Justin | 40% | 45% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
25 | LOTTNER Samuel | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
26 | ZHAO Royce | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
27 | ONUGHA II Emeka | 3% | 25% | 45% | 23% | 3% | - |
28 | SAYAR Luke | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
28 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
30 | SASSI Ilyas | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.