New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
2 | TSUI Natalie | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
3 | MARYASH Samantha | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
3 | LIU Yifei | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
5 | SO Catelyn | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
6 | NATH Trisha | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
7 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
8 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
9 | NAYAK Esha | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
10 | MUND Ruth | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
11 | ZHANG Sophie | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
12 | GUVEN Coco | 1% | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
13 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
14 | ZENG Sarah | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
15 | HUCHWAJDA Pola | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
16 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
17 | ZHENG Valentina | 1% | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
18 | FLATT Sophia | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
19 | FEIG Sela | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 20% | |
20 | DAI Olivia | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
21 | CHIANG Melissa | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
22 | HU Anna | 1% | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
23 | ZHENG Sophia | 24% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
24 | CHOU Zoe | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
25 | HUANG Rachael | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
26 | SPEARS Mya B | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
27 | LOURENCO Alexandra | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
28 | BAIREDDY Maya | 11% | 43% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | |
29 | HE Lizbeth | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
30 | GUGALA Hanna | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
31 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
32 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
33 | BUSH Bethany | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
34 | LI Alexis | 2% | 27% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
35 | PROBASCO Leila | 9% | 40% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
36 | KHOST Maeve | 8% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
37 | LIM Alexa J. | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
38 | BERNSTEIN Avery | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
39 | NAYAK Antara | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | |
40 | CHO Kaeli M. | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
41 | BERRIOS Catalina | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
42 | BAINS Nandini | 48% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
43 | KAPLAN Gabriela | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
44 | BAIK Madeline | 62% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.