New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HUANG Alex F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 34% | |
| 2 | TURCK Caspar J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | |
| 3 | FELDMAN Drew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
| 3 | TANG Shu Hon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
| 5 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% | |
| 6 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 7 | VAROQUA Nalby | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% | |
| 8 | SEN Christian | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 9 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 10 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% | |
| 11 | NG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% | |
| 12 | BAKER Sean | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 1% | |
| 13 | HAPP Braeden | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 14 | OH Aster | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 5% | |
| 15 | FTAIHA Ezra | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
| 16 | HERR Gabriele | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 8% | |
| 18 | ALAVE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 19 | MCDONALD Finn | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 20 | MENDOZA Diwa | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 21 | LEE Anderson | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | KIM Theodore | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | TIAGI George | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 24 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 25 | SIMATOS Luka D. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | KALOUDIS Sean | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | MATTOO Surya | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 28 | SINHA Ishaan | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | BIVIJI Ali | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 30 | MONTALVO Matthew | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | COURTIN Frederic | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 32 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | MATTOO Deven | 100% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | CHEA Caden | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | |
| 36 | KAZIMIR Harrison | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 37 | O'GRADY Declan | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.