Windy City ROC /RJCC

Cadet Men’s Foil (CDTMF)

Sunday, May 5, 2024 at 3:45 PM

Register

The Athletico Center - Northbrook, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2506 2691 - 2326
5 - 8 2234 2329 - 2062
9 - 16 1729 2070 - 1605
17 - 24 1356 1569 - 1055

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Guth, Joseph Cleveland Fencing Academy East LLC B24 2691 2428.71
2 Howland, Jonas Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club B24 2535 2272.57
3 Chuang, Oscar Fencing Center Of Chicago C24 2473 2221.91
4 Shevchenko, Kostiantyn Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy C24 2326 2073.07
5 Tan, Xinlai Twin Cities Fencing Club C24 2329 2044.53
6 VanOyen, Dominick Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy D24 2274 2017.47
7 Twemlow, Sacha Bronzeville Fencing Academy D24 2270 1996.28
8 LIU, Yinhong RedStar Fencing Club Chicago D24 2062 1801.11
9 Sun, Ryan D23 2070 1746.14
10 Holliday, Christopher Mansfield-Scott RedStar Fencing Club Chicago E24 1900 1575.62
11 Zmuda, Aiden West Michigan Fencing Academy E24 1645 1380.62
12 Zinser, James South YEL Fencing Alliance U 1717 1369.12
13 Kagan, Noah Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1651 1360.57
14 Hong, Derek Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1632 1304.18
15 Davis, Benjamin Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1612 1212.62
16 Ryan, Nash Royal Arts Fencing Academy U 1605 1151.37
17 Herrera, Xavier Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1473 1123.10
18 Bales, Gabriel Iowa City Fencing Center E24 1489 1106.83
19 Zhang, Hanson Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1401 1082.69
20 Lim-Seiwert, Tristan Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1245 765.92
21 Robinson, Ezekiel RecPlex Fencing Club U 1431 663.54
22 Kolacki, Gabriel Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1055 609.97
23 Suh, Kairos Caliburn Fencing Club U 1569 253.56
24 Neri, Fletcher Illinois Fencing Academy U 1181 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!