Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MALYSZ Anthony J. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
2 | VISURAKAPALLI Sathvik | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
3 | MARTIN Nathan C | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
3 | UKOLOV Dimitri | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
5 | FREDERIKSEN Ean L. | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
6 | FREDERIKSEN Elijah L. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% | |
7 | VAN TASSEL Schuyler | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
8 | TOPAZ Nicholas | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
9 | MASON Alexander T. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
10 | ROBINSON Keegan | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
11 | HANE Matthew J. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
12 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
13 | KELSEY Ryan | - | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% | |
14 | SHERWOOD Dominic | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
15 | TAYLOR Nolan J. | 10% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
16 | CHITU Andreas C. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
17 | AYUSH Shah | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 8% | |
18 | PATEL Neal | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
19 | SCHLEICHER Edward | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
20 | RICCHIUTI Nikola | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
22 | PRICE Luke D. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
23 | BORTHWICK Benjamin J. | 18% | 43% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
24 | BARTCH Ethan | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - | |
25 | KNOWLES Ethan | 4% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
26 | GRAEWE Tommaso | 22% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.