Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WILSON Jeffrey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 12% |
| 2 | MCDONNELL Michael | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 3 | AMRINE Terry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
| 3 | KAROLAK Dale W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 27% | |
| 5 | TOOMEY Brian L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
| 6 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 7 | OCHS Bradley C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 8 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
| 9 | WILKINSON Derek H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
| 10 | DICKSON Tim | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 11 | LARTZ John A. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 10% | 1% | |
| 12 | SILVANIA Michael | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 13 | ANDERSON Michael L. | 100% | 75% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 14 | KLINE R. Jay | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 15 | TATE Leon J. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | HUNKER Frederick | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 18 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 19 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.