Freehold Fencing Academy - Freehold, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PETERS Nathan M. | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 43% |
| 2 | SVERDLOV Seth | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 42% | 15% |
| 3 | MATHEWS Rocco | 3% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | |
| 3 | ANDERSON Riley | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 5 | TOMASZEWSKI Joshua | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 6 | WOLFSOHN Peleg | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 7 | SHULKIN Mark | 3% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 8 | SHIN Sangjune | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 9 | TOMASZEWSKI Simon | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 7% | |
| 10 | XIAN Andy | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 11 | KIRSCH Adam | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 12 | LEE Kevin | 75% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | LI David | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.