Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NGUYEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
| 2 | NEMETH Katherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
| 3 | WALLER Sarah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 7% |
| 3 | LEUNG Wan Kiu Hayley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 5 | FAN Yun Cian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% |
| 6 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% | |
| 7 | LU Shiqi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 8 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | REMEZA Alissa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | |
| 10 | GAO Judy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 11 | LI Alisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 5% |
| 12 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 13 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
| 15 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 16 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 17 | LEE yat ching | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 18 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 14% |
| 19 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 36% | 11% | 2% |
| 20 | FAN Elizabeth | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 21 | EDWARDS Auprell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
| 22 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 23 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 24 | DENG Annie | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 26 | NGUYEN Audrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 27 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 28 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | |
| 30 | SONG Angela | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | |
| 31 | HONG Elaine | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 32 | PEELER Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 33 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
| 34 | AHUJA Arianna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 11% |
| 35 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 36 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 37 | PARK Judy | 100% | 100% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 38 | YAO KATHARINE | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% |
| 39 | LONADIER Keira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 40 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 41 | KELLY Jenna | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | HAWKINS Laura A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% |
| 43 | BUSH emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
| 43 | LI Fei | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 45 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | SOTELO Michelle | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | PEARSON Heila | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | |
| 48 | KIZILBASH Zara | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 49 | JOHN Venus | 100% | 92% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 51 | AI Amy | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 52 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 53 | ZHANG ANGELA | 100% | 97% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 55 | ANDERSON Nora E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 56 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 57 | RHEINECKER Claire | 100% | 79% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 58 | SPURLIN Alicen | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 59 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 60 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 61 | WANG Esther | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 62 | ALEXANDER Amelia | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 63 | KUMAR Anusha | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 64 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Maia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 65 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 66 | XIONG Angelica | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 67 | DU Shunyi（Wendy） | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 68 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 69 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 70 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 71 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% | |
| 72 | SINHA Zara | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 72 | KANEVSKY Samantha | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 74 | ZHAO Ivy | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 75 | UNGURIANU Nika | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 76 | COURTNEY Elya Rebekah | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 77 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 78 | PEARSON Arwa | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 79 | XIE Fiona | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 80 | MOON Seojung | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% | |
| 81 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 82 | DONG Ava | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 83 | SANDERS Charlotte | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 84 | CHENG Katherine | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 85 | DONGES Anna | 100% | 99% | 84% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 86 | GOLART Alexis A. | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 87 | BA Sujuan | 100% | 88% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | SHERTZ Kira E. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 89 | NOH Rachel | 100% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 90 | JACKSON Viktoria | 100% | 87% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 91 | GORTI Ramya | 100% | 81% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
| 92 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 93 | NEELAM Neha | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 94 | STECKMEISTER Evelyn | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 95 | DAVIS Elisabeth | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 96 | MIHILL Margaret | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 96 | RHEINECKER Eleanora Grace | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 98 | GOSART Hailee | 100% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 99 | MAY Courtney | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 100 | BURDOO Nora | 100% | 23% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.