Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 65% |
2 | GU Sarah | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
3 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 81% |
3 | NGUYEN Kira | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 19% | |
5 | YIN Julia | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
6 | LUO Ashley | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
7 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 28% | |
8 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
9 | PADHYE Tanishka | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
10 | XIAO Ruien | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
11 | JAKEL Sophia N. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
11 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
13 | KORFONTA Jolie | - | - | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
14 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
15 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
16 | ZHAO Ivy | 1% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
17 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
18 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
19 | XUAN Nicole J. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 45% | 23% | |
20 | YANG Alisa | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 10% | |
21 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
22 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
23 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% | |
24 | LEE REGINA | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
25 | ZHU Serene M. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
26 | LEE yat ching | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
27 | YOU Emily | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
28 | ZHANG Victoria R. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
29 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% | |
30 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
31 | LI Fei | 16% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | |
32 | FURMAN Maria | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
33 | HONG Elaine | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
34 | GORNOVSKY Abigail | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% | |
35 | REID Anousheh | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 26% | |
36 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
37 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% | |
38 | TRAN Helena | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | |
39 | LIU Nicole | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
40 | REMEZA Alissa | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
41 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
42 | WONG Alexandra R. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
43 | CALDERA Lexi I. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
44 | SWENSON Nikita G. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 1% |
45 | FENG ge | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
46 | CANNING Charlotte | 5% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
47 | PRIHODKO Nina | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
48 | PULLEN Ayah | 23% | 42% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
49 | YAO Yilin | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
50 | LEE Olivia | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
51 | GUJJA Misha | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 3% | |
52 | NEMETH Katherine | - | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
53 | CREMONA Viola Maria | 2% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
54 | LI Zhenni (Jenny) | 11% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
55 | YAO Melinda | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | |
56 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
57 | SENYUVA Su | 1% | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
58 | LIN Elaine | - | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
59 | LEE Yedda | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% | |
60 | AZMEH nour | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
61 | ANDERSON Claire | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
62 | YAO KATHARINE | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
63 | YU Nicole J. | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
64 | ENRILE Erica | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
65 | KUMAR Eva | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
66 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
67 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
68 | HSIU Elizabeth | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
69 | SONG Angela | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
70 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% | |
71 | SHU Youshan | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - |
72 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
73 | PARK Judy | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
74 | CAFASSO Natalya | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
75 | BUSH emma | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
76 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
77 | LIN Ariel | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
78 | JAKEL Alysa C. | - | 2% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
79 | CHI Chelsea | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
80 | KORKIN Alice | 1% | 28% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | |
81 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
82 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
83 | PEHLIVANI Zara | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 34% | 10% | |
83 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
85 | PEELER Julia | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
86 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 16% | 49% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
87 | BECKMAN Ana | 2% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
88 | FAN Elizabeth | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
89 | LIN Ashley | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
90 | ALEXANDER Amelia | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
91 | YOU Isabel B. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
92 | NEELAM Neha | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
93 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 1% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
94 | AI Amy | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | |
95 | KUMAR Anusha | 28% | 47% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
96 | GOLART Alexis A. | 29% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
97 | QI Jarynne Valerie | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
98 | HUANG Lanlan | 2% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
99 | RHEINECKER Claire | 17% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
100 | ZHANG ANGELA | 4% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
101 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
102 | DONG Ava | 2% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
102 | XIONG Angelica | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
104 | WANG Esther | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
105 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | 21% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
106 | MIHILL Margaret | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
107 | LEE Camilla | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
107 | DENG Annie | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
109 | DAVIS Elisabeth | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
110 | CHENG Katherine | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
111 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
112 | SNYDER Kathryn | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
113 | NOH Rachel | 94% | 6% | - | - | - | - | |
114 | MIRZA Annoshae | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
114 | GORTI Aadya | 73% | 26% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
116 | PEARSON Arwa | 51% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
117 | GORTI Ramya | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.