Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
| 2 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 50% |
| 3 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
| 3 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 5 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 6 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
| 7 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | - | - | - | 9% | 45% | 46% |
| 8 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 30% | |
| 9 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 42% | 48% | |
| 10 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
| 11 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 12 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
| 13 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 14 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 13% |
| 15 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | GU EMILY | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 18 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 53% | 30% |
| 19 | JING Emily | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
| 20 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% | |
| 21 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 22 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 36% | 44% | 8% |
| 23 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 39% | 9% |
| 24 | LUO Sandra J. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 1% |
| 24 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
| 26 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% |
| 27 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 16% | |
| 28 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 3% | 24% | 43% | 26% | 4% | |
| 29 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | 5% | 26% | 48% | 20% | |
| 30 | ZHANG Eunice | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 1% | |
| 31 | FUNG Emma | 1% | 11% | 37% | 38% | 12% | 1% | |
| 32 | YANG Iris | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 33 | JANG Kimberley | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
| 34 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 1% |
| 34 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 38% | 11% |
| 34 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 15% |
| 37 | HAN Crystal | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 38 | LEE Lavender | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | ROY Layla | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 40 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | 7% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 41 | WANDJI Anais | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 14% | |
| 42 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | 1% | 14% | 55% | 26% | 3% |
| 43 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 1% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 44 | O'NEIL Neve | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 45 | MEI Sarah | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 46 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 2% | 23% | 43% | 27% | 4% | |
| 47 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
| 48 | VAUGHAN Norah | 7% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 49 | SHENG Chuxi | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 50 | MI Aileen | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 51 | SHA Yi Ling | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 52 | CALISE Ella | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 1% |
| 53 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
| 54 | ZHENG Julie | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 55 | COOPER Piper W. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 56 | CANNON Lira J. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 57 | KOSTELNY Alexis | - | 2% | 19% | 43% | 31% | 6% | |
| 58 | SHIM Grace | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 2% | |
| 59 | CHANG Elizabeth | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 2% | |
| 60 | LEE Ji Ahn | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 61 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 47% | 16% |
| 62 | SHEN Emilia | 18% | 48% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
| 63 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 64 | PAULUS Isabella | 4% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 65 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 66 | WELBORN Calissa | - | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 67 | HOBSON Ava | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 68 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | - | 7% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 69 | LAI Sophia | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 70 | HAN Ashley | 2% | 28% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 71 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 72 | BATRA Chaahat | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 12% |
| 73 | LI Sophia M. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 74 | LEVY Avery | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 75 | MU Allison | 1% | 10% | 38% | 43% | 8% | - | - |
| 76 | FU Qihan | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% | |
| 77 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 1% | 14% | 39% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 78 | GAO Anna | 29% | 57% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 79 | PHILLIPS Hattie | 25% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 80 | BASSIK Eva | 1% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 81 | LIN Ju-An Adrianne | - | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 82 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 83 | LIN Victoria T. | 5% | 28% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 84 | HWANG Alison | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 85 | WANG Jasmine | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 86 | PARK Leah | 4% | 41% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 87 | JIANG Claire | 2% | 49% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | CASTANEDA Keira | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 89 | GANDLURI Sreehitha (Sarah) | 4% | 30% | 45% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 90 | LUH Mia P. | 27% | 52% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 91 | NEUMAN Sophie | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 92 | LEE Fiona E. | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 93 | ROHRING Anna | 7% | 39% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | KAPUSTINA Arina | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 95 | BOLES Amanda X. | 1% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 96 | PAULUS Sloane | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | ZHENG Zoe | 23% | 49% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 98 | HUBERT AVA CLAIRE | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 99 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 1% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 100 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 21% | 52% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 101 | BAWA Sahana | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 102 | OWENS Elise | 54% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 103 | SHAH Suhani | 47% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 104 | YU Jane | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 105 | KUNDU TRISHA | 39% | 45% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 106 | WANG Celine S. | 17% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 107 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | 55% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 108 | GUEVARRA Isabelle C. | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 108 | DONG Emily | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 110 | HE Katherine | 62% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 110 | MULLER Van | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 112 | SUNMAN Rory | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 113 | DHULIPALA Aparna | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 113 | SPECTOR Eliana | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.