Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
2 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 50% |
3 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
3 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
5 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
6 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
7 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | - | - | - | 9% | 45% | 46% |
8 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 30% | |
9 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 42% | 48% | |
10 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
11 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
12 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
13 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
14 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 13% |
15 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
16 | GU EMILY | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
17 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
18 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 53% | 30% |
19 | JING Emily | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
20 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% | |
21 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
22 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 36% | 44% | 8% |
23 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 39% | 9% |
24 | LUO Sandra J. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 1% |
24 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
26 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% |
27 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 16% | |
28 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 3% | 24% | 43% | 26% | 4% | |
29 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | 5% | 26% | 48% | 20% | |
30 | ZHANG Eunice | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 1% | |
31 | FUNG Emma | 1% | 11% | 37% | 38% | 12% | 1% | |
32 | YANG Iris | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
33 | JANG Kimberley | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
34 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 1% |
34 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 38% | 11% |
34 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 15% |
37 | HAN Crystal | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - |
38 | LEE Lavender | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
39 | ROY Layla | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
40 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | 7% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
41 | WANDJI Anais | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 14% | |
42 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | 1% | 14% | 55% | 26% | 3% |
43 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 1% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
44 | O'NEIL Neve | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
45 | MEI Sarah | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
46 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 2% | 23% | 43% | 27% | 4% | |
47 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
48 | VAUGHAN Norah | 7% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
49 | SHENG Chuxi | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
50 | MI Aileen | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
51 | SHA Yi Ling | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
52 | CALISE Ella | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 1% |
53 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
54 | ZHENG Julie | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | - |
55 | COOPER Piper W. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
56 | CANNON Lira J. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
57 | KOSTELNY Alexis | - | 2% | 19% | 43% | 31% | 6% | |
58 | SHIM Grace | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 2% | |
59 | CHANG Elizabeth | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 2% | |
60 | LEE Ji Ahn | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
61 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 47% | 16% |
62 | SHEN Emilia | 18% | 48% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
63 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
64 | PAULUS Isabella | 4% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
65 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | - |
66 | WELBORN Calissa | - | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
67 | HOBSON Ava | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
68 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | - | 7% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
69 | LAI Sophia | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - |
70 | HAN Ashley | 2% | 28% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
71 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
72 | BATRA Chaahat | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 12% |
73 | LI Sophia M. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
74 | LEVY Avery | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 3% | - |
75 | MU Allison | 1% | 10% | 38% | 43% | 8% | - | - |
76 | FU Qihan | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% | |
77 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 1% | 14% | 39% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
78 | GAO Anna | 29% | 57% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
79 | PHILLIPS Hattie | 25% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
80 | BASSIK Eva | 1% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
81 | LIN Ju-An Adrianne | - | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
82 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - |
83 | LIN Victoria T. | 5% | 28% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
84 | HWANG Alison | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
85 | WANG Jasmine | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
86 | PARK Leah | 4% | 41% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
87 | JIANG Claire | 2% | 49% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
88 | CASTANEDA Keira | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
89 | GANDLURI Sreehitha (Sarah) | 4% | 30% | 45% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
90 | LUH Mia P. | 27% | 52% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
91 | NEUMAN Sophie | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
92 | LEE Fiona E. | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
93 | ROHRING Anna | 7% | 39% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
94 | KAPUSTINA Arina | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
95 | BOLES Amanda X. | 1% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
96 | PAULUS Sloane | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
97 | ZHENG Zoe | 23% | 49% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
98 | HUBERT AVA CLAIRE | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
99 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 1% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
100 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 21% | 52% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
101 | BAWA Sahana | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
102 | OWENS Elise | 54% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
103 | SHAH Suhani | 47% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
104 | YU Jane | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
105 | KUNDU TRISHA | 39% | 45% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
106 | WANG Celine S. | 17% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
107 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | 55% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | |
108 | GUEVARRA Isabelle C. | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
108 | DONG Emily | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
110 | HE Katherine | 62% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
110 | MULLER Van | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
112 | SUNMAN Rory | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
113 | DHULIPALA Aparna | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
113 | SPECTOR Eliana | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.