San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BLOOMER Suzanne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 2 | GORDET Cristina G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 16% | |
| 3 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 24% | 4% | |
| 3 | ASHER Valerie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 5 | LEIGHTON Louise N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% | |
| 6 | MONTOYA Amy C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 10% | |
| 7 | LOVE Georgina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | |
| 8 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 9 | TELLES Anna | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 10 | MARX Suzanne Brown | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 11 | WALTERS Anne-Marie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 12 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 13 | RICH Caroline B. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 14 | FABRY Lydia L. | 100% | 85% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 15 | JENSEN MJ | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 16 | WIESSLER-HUGHES Linda | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 17 | EL-SALEH S.S. Rachel | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 18 | TASKER Monisha B. | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 19 | MANDEL Helen (Jenner) | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.