San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
| 2 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 43% | 42% |
| 3 | TOLLEY Toby | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 3 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% | |
| 5 | SCHMID Carola K. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 37% | 10% |
| 6 | EXUM Monica M. | - | - | 1% | 16% | 47% | 35% | |
| 7 | ROWLAND May | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 8 | CAREY Michele S. | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | |
| 9 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 41% | 33% | 7% |
| 10 | BYRON Karen J. | 8% | 32% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 11 | DREYER Nadia S. | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 12 | FRANZ Lisa L. | 7% | 34% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 13 | BOWEN Victoria M. | - | - | 7% | 39% | 39% | 13% | 1% |
| 14 | WOLF Lisa A. | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% | |
| 15 | GROCE Linda J. | 32% | 48% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 16 | LEE Jeanette | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | BREIER Michelle | 23% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 18 | SIMARD Sherrol A. | 33% | 50% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 19 | OSTERBAUER Nancy K. | 15% | 47% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.