San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ||
1 | REFAEE Ahmed H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% |
2 | SEIDEL Jonathan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 6% |
3 | PLONKA Derek | 100% | 100% | 97% | 87% | 64% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
3 | CHANG Eric | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
5 | SOSKINS Matt | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
6 | COLTER richard | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
7 | LI Li | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
8 | DAWSON Todd | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 66% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
9 | WINER Heath B. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 38% | 13% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.