San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | VIDOVSZKY Tamas J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% |
| 2 | THORNTON Ronald J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
| 3 | BECKER William L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
| 3 | PHILLIPS Kim V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 27% |
| 5 | BACON Michael F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 51% |
| 6 | ZIPPER Michael E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 6% |
| 7 | FLOYD Dale | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 4% |
| 8 | GRAFF Jon | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 19% | 1% |
| 9 | ESCUETA Jr Antonio V. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 15% | - |
| 10 | KAOURIS George | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 28% | 2% |
| 11 | MIGHELL Jason | 100% | 100% | 92% | 53% | 6% | - |
| 12 | RICHARDSON Troy A. | 100% | 99% | 68% | 20% | 1% | - |
| 13 | MARTINEZ Mario D. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | 1% |
| 14 | UYANIK Muhammet | 100% | 87% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 15 | ZOLLER Matthew | 100% | 85% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 16 | CHEN Lester | 100% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 17 | RYBKIN Alexander V. | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 18 | MEHTA Nalin J. | 100% | 72% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 19 | YOUNG Nick | 100% | 98% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 20 | DALRYMPLE Sr. Ronald W. | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 21 | KORINTH Steve | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | ZINNI Gene | 100% | 96% | 69% | 25% | 3% | - |
| 23 | STONE Brad | 100% | 65% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | CHANG LAWRENCE | 100% | 14% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.