San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WALTERS Anne-Marie | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 26% |
| 2 | LOVE Georgina | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 46% | 37% |
| 3 | STARKS-FAULKNER Jennette | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 24% |
| 3 | MERRITT Elizabeth (Badger) E. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
| 5 | TRELOAR Allison F. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 6 | HERMES Kathleen A. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 7 | HUEY Sharone A. | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 2% |
| 8 | ALZONA Esperanza P. | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 9 | WHITT Lynnette A. | 1% | 9% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 10 | MARX Suzanne Brown | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
| 11 | TASKER Monisha B. | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 12 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | 35% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 13 | GUNTRUM Pamella (Pam) L. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 14 | EL-SALEH S.S. Rachel | 41% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.