San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 68% |
2 | DIAZ Julio P. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 44% | 13% |
3 | OLIVARES Frets G. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 22% | |
3 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% |
5 | POPOKH Leo | - | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 4% |
6 | CHILTON Ken | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 44% | 9% |
7 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
8 | KISSINGFORD John F. | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
9 | FOELLMER Oliver K. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% |
10 | CHO Michael | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 43% | 20% | |
11 | LEE Stephen K. | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 12% | |
12 | FADL Omar | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
13 | GRISWOLD Doug | 11% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
14 | WU Clarence C. | 3% | 30% | 41% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
15 | BIERY George M. | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
16 | DENMAN Matthew L. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% | - |
17 | PROCOPIO Gregory M. | 1% | 18% | 47% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
18 | LUONG Allen | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 42% | 15% | 1% |
19 | POWERS Douglas A. | 5% | 25% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | |
20 | GALLUCH Peter G. | 21% | 48% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
21 | SUAREZ Rolando | 6% | 42% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
22 | HO John | 37% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
23 | DALRYMPLE Sr. Ronald W. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% | - |
24 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
25 | BERGER Jamie | 6% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
26 | WEMPLE Charles | 78% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
27 | FUHRMANN Amir | 56% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.