San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KARYUCHENKO Dmytro | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
2 | MACZIK Adam W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
3 | LICHTEN Keith H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | |
3 | HEDGES Philip S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | |
5 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
6 | ALLEN Graham | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
7 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 6% | |
8 | SALLEMBIEN Nicolas H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
9 | STOCK Jordan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
10 | PHO Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 10% |
11 | SLATER Michael D. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
12 | LIN Kimball | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
13 | YAO Shun | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
14 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
15 | SLOAN Ryan | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
16 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
17 | MAKMATOV Vadim | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 1% | |
18 | OLANDER Gabriel | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
19 | HARRELL D. Fox | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 21% | 1% | |
20 | SMITH Brandon J. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - | |
21 | ABBONDANZIO David R. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | |
22 | KIM Jeff | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
23 | FERRIERE Thomas | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
24 | KUO Michael | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
25 | LEE David S. | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
26 | BERMENDER Eric | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.