San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | MOREAU John A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
| 2 | BOTHELIO Jere P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 49% | 9% | |
| 3 | SCHNEIDER Charles (Charlie) J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 71% | 21% | |
| 3 | TAYLOR Daryl J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% |
| 5 | SPAHN Jeff | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 6 | CATES Archie W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% |
| 7 | WEINGARTEN Solomon (Sol) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% |
| 8 | BLAKLEY Dwain | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% | 7% |
| 9 | LIPP Robert (Bob) J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% |
| 10 | GOOSSENS Bruno | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | 45% | |
| 11 | KING Richard (Dick) M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 12 | REDDING Russel M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 4% |
| 13 | HENRY Mark R. | 100% | 93% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 14 | ALPERSTEIN Donald W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 15 | RIDLEY Alan P. | 100% | 65% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 16 | LEONARDINI Barry M. | 100% | 71% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | 13% | 1% |
| 18 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 19 | JEFFERIES Jonathan J. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | SIMARD Ernie E. | 100% | 78% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | SIMONI James (Jim) V. | 100% | 67% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 22 | REA John P. | 100% | 40% | 3% | - | - | |
| 23 | BARBARA patrick | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.