Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | THOMAS Samuel | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
| 2 | HANAHAN Tom M. | - | 2% | 18% | 51% | 29% | |
| 3 | WINGET Bill D. | 9% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 3 | BOLARIN Oluwatosin | 2% | 20% | 50% | 28% | ||
| 5 | KRAJ Pawel | 12% | 45% | 36% | 7% | ||
| 6 | CRAPNELL Daniel | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 7 | DICKSON Tim | 10% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 8 | THRASHER Andrew W. | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 9 | CARTER Miranda | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | GOSMEYER Matthew | 4% | 26% | 45% | 25% | ||
| 11 | RIPLEY Ian | 10% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 12 | BERGSMA Karl | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 14 | PARCELEWICZ John | < 1% | 3% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% |
| 15 | ORGAN Jason | 47% | 41% | 12% | 1% | ||
| 16 | SWEETS Aidan | 16% | 41% | 33% | 9% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.