Golden State Classic RYC

Youth 8 Men’s Foil (Y8MF)

Sunday, May 5, 2024 at 2:30 PM

Register

MT. SAC ATHLETICS COMPLEX EAST - Walnut, CA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1853 2001 - 1751
5 - 8 1589 1651 - 1514
9 - 16 1232 1404 - 950
17 - 27 1237 2500 - 804

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lu, Brandon Golubitsky Fencing Center U 2001 1659.70
2 Sun, Roy SoCAL Fencing Center U 1876 1528.24
3 Turbat, Travis Precision Athletics Fencing Club U 1783 1482.61
4 Lozano, Koen Alexander LA International Fencing U 1751 1336.61
5 Huang, Owen SoCAL Fencing Center U 1651 1272.80
6 Zhang, William Team Touche Fencing Center U 1630 1213.92
7 Liu, Michael SoCAL Fencing Center U 1514 1060.09
8 Xu, Daniel LA International Fencing U 1560 898.11
9 Meng, Eric Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1404 875.65
10 Meng, Andy Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1314 859.91
11 Zhang, Bosen Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1292 813.55
12 Sun, Lucas Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1223 639.35
13 Yin, Luke SoCAL Fencing Center U 1343 621.74
14 Chang, Owen Precision Athletics Fencing Club U 1242 584.09
15 Li, Ethan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1091 413.03
16 zhang, alex SoCAL Fencing Center U 950 282.27
17 Wang, Eavan SoCAL Fencing Center U 1228 265.23
18 Lin, Evan SoCAL Fencing Center U 1572 237.08
19 Li, Mason Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 933 224.42
20 Zhang, Lucas LA International Fencing U 1139 202.25
21 Chang, Allen Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1148 180.81
22 Xu, Benjamin Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1107 26.64
23 Shi, Ethan ValorUSA Fencing Club LLC U 2500 < 0
24 Cremel, Louis Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 804 < 0
25 DONG, YIKUN Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 815 < 0
26 Bagwell, Theodore LA International Fencing U 968 < 0
27 Bertel, Timothee Beverly Hills Fencers' Club U 1388 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!