Trick or Retreat ROC/RJCC/RYC

Division II Women’s Saber (DV2WS)

Saturday, August 17, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Register

NJ Convention & Exposition Center - Edison, NJ

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2270 2653 - 2138
5 - 8 2108 2366 - 2001
9 - 16 1882 2009 - 1742
17 - 25 1614 1851 - 1168

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Khan, Alissa Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C23 2653 2403.14
2 Barroso, Isabela Nova Fencing Club C24 2149 1886.49
3 Zheng, Valentina Lilov Fencing Academy C24 2138 1879.24
4 McGraw, Sadie Nittany Fencing Academy D24 2140 1860.68
5 Myat, Chloe Fencing Academy Of Westchester C24 2047 1794.82
6 li, Yitong Aura Fencing Academy U 2366 1738.54
7 Krasowitz, Lucy Nittany Fencing Academy E23 2001 1730.60
8 Cao, Sophie Nazlymov Fencing Foundation D24 2019 1721.82
9 Chi, Claire Capital Fencing Academy D24 1943 1686.18
10 Huang, Pierra Bergen Fencing Club U 1929 1664.05
11 McSweeney, Kylie Johns Hopkins University NCAA C24 2009 1635.97
12 Randall-Collins, Shea Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E24 1878 1617.58
13 Kalinichenko, Yekaterina Stamford Fencing Center, LLC D22 1865 1582.53
14 Nanda, Maanika New Jersey Fencing Alliance E24 1840 1580.76
15 Butman, Chloe Alexandra Scarsdale Fencing Center E24 1852 1505.19
16 Vats, Ishita New Jersey Fencing Alliance E24 1742 1468.18
17 Hanlon, Lucy Nittany Fencing Academy U 1851 1442.66
18 Wong, Charlene Aura Fencing Academy E24 1695 1439.59
19 Yoon, Sela Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1629 1298.22
20 Nayak, Antara Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy E24 1614 1284.21
21 Marosfoi, Virag Hills Fencing Institute E24 1653 1255.93
22 Magitsky, Leila Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1601 1226.19
23 Dunn, Kathryn E24 1821 1074.21
24 Alami, Amira Fencers Club Inc. U 1492 1066.66
25 Baik, Madeline Durkan Fencing Academy U 1168 318.13

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!