Trick or Retreat ROC/RJCC/RYC

Division II Women’s Saber (DV2WS)

Saturday, August 17, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Register

NJ Convention & Exposition Center - Edison, NJ

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2265 2645 - 2134
5 - 8 2090 2442 - 1944
9 - 16 1855 1950 - 1729
17 - 25 1544 1898 - 1168

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Khan, Alissa Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C23 2645 2390.19
2 Myat, Chloe Fencing Academy Of Westchester C24 2142 1887.11
3 Zheng, Valentina Lilov Fencing Academy C24 2139 1870.20
4 McGraw, Sadie Nittany Fencing Academy D24 2134 1852.99
5 Cao, Sophie Nazlymov Fencing Foundation D24 2014 1714.49
6 Randall-Collins, Shea Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E24 1960 1689.08
7 Barroso, Isabela Nova Fencing Club C24 1944 1650.35
8 li, Yitong Aura Fencing Academy U 2442 1648.02
9 Krasowitz, Lucy Nittany Fencing Academy E23 1898 1597.44
10 Kalinichenko, Yekaterina Stamford Fencing Center, LLC D22 1873 1590.87
11 Chi, Claire Capital Fencing Academy D24 1834 1559.84
12 McSweeney, Kylie Johns Hopkins University NCAA C24 1950 1537.76
13 Huang, Pierra Bergen Fencing Club U 1783 1451.57
14 Nanda, Maanika New Jersey Fencing Alliance E24 1729 1431.14
15 Butman, Chloe Alexandra Scarsdale Fencing Center E24 1884 1400.98
16 Hanlon, Lucy Nittany Fencing Academy U 1886 1389.32
17 Vats, Ishita New Jersey Fencing Alliance E24 1650 1321.13
18 Marosfoi, Virag Hills Fencing Institute E24 1653 1255.93
19 Wong, Charlene Aura Fencing Academy E24 1530 1255.32
20 Yoon, Sela Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1555 1152.63
21 Magitsky, Leila Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1508 1103.35
22 Alami, Amira Fencers Club Inc. U 1502 1072.75
23 Nayak, Antara Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy E24 1432 1068.49
24 Dunn, Kathryn E24 1898 1009.48
25 Baik, Madeline Durkan Fencing Academy U 1168 318.13

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!