Cobra Fencing Club - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIN Maxim | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
2 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
3 | URSU Marcel T. | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% | |
3 | VUONG Kyle Ka-Him | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
5 | NG Jonathan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
6 | RAJMOHAN Arya | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
7 | BIVIJI Ali | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
8 | YANG Si He | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
9 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 51% | 14% | |
10 | BIVIJI Adam | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
11 | KUMAR Avinash | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
12 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 5% | - | |
13 | MARTINSON Torm | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
14 | LIU Ryan | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
15 | KENNEDY Tomás | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | - | |
16 | TATAR Daniel | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
17 | KUSHKOV Michael | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
18 | DE SIENA Salvatore | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
19 | JIN Daniel | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
20 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 14% | 42% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
21 | CHUNG Loden | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
22 | CRUZ Vien Iñigo | 44% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
23 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 12% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
24 | PAI Ayan | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
25 | TRZEPLA Max | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
26 | BARENBOYM Michael | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
27 | LOPEZ Brandon | 3% | 31% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.