The Sportsplex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LU Junyao | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 2 | NGUYEN Kira | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 3 | REMEZA Alissa | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 3 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
| 5 | GAO Judy | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 15% |
| 6 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 7 | LIN Elaine | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 8 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | FURMAN Maria | - | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 10% |
| 10 | LUO Ashley | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% | |
| 11 | WITTE Vera | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 12 | GUJJA Misha | - | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 7% |
| 13 | PRIHODKO Nina | - | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 14 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | HICKS Grace | 1% | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 16 | CLAYTON Alanna | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 17 | SHU Youshan | - | 3% | 15% | 39% | 38% | 5% | |
| 18 | LI Alisha | - | - | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% |
| 19 | FENG ge | - | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
| 20 | MING Cynthia | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 21 | WONG Kairis | 4% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 22 | CANNING Charlotte | - | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 23 | LI Fei | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 24 | COSTA Leah | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 25 | LATORA Jordan | 1% | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 26 | MEYER Rachel | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | JIA Elizabeth | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | ZHU Serene M. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 29 | EGBUCHULAM Ugonna | 4% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | FAZZINI Angelina | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 31 | SHEIN Evita | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | - | |
| 32 | JOHN Venus | 6% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | YANG Charlotte | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | SELIZHUK Stasya | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 35 | GORTI Ramya | 41% | 44% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 36 | ZOU Jiayi-Hannah | 21% | 50% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 5% | 34% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | SHANKERDAS Shreeya | 6% | 30% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | GONG Wanqiao | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | BHATT Hailey | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | PRADHAN Aditi | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.