Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 2 | KRASTEV Minna | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 3 | WANG Zidan | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 3 | DANG Kelia | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% |
| 5 | HUAI Delilah | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 6 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 7 | YANG Lea | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 8 | ZOLLER Noelle | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 9 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 10 | SCHOEW Margot | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 11 | CHO Michelle | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 12 | PYO Penelope E. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 13 | BROCK Sydney | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
| 14 | LIU Sydney | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 15 | CHAN Jolene | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 16 | MANN Sophia J. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 17 | TONG Jessie | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
| 18 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 19 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
| 20 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 21 | DUDNICK Morgan | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 22 | STONE Coral | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 23 | HUANG Rachael | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 24 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 1% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 25 | DIECK Miranda P. | 7% | 31% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | JIANG Mu Jia (Michelle) | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | SAWANT Asmi | 22% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | YAM Danika | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 29 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | ARMSTRONG Katherine | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | XA-CHIN Sara | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 32 | KIM Elyssa | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 33 | KIM Caitlin | 3% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | KORINTH Jacqueline | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | IYER Arushi | 20% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | FENG Alicia G. | < 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 37 | BAO Jingxuan | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | HAN Emma | 28% | 45% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | YAO Rainie | 13% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.