Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE REGINA | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 46% | |
| 2 | LEE Natasha | - | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% |
| 3 | MUN Brianna K. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 43% | 42% | |
| 3 | WANG Ziqi | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 5 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
| 6 | MARTYNOVA Diana | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 10% |
| 7 | HUANG Lanlan | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 8 | HSIU Elizabeth | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% | |
| 9 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | - | - | - | 4% | 38% | 58% |
| 10 | BARBARA Camille | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% | |
| 11 | LEE Camilla | - | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
| 12 | LIU Baihan | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 31% | 5% |
| 13 | PHUKAN Indra | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 14 | SU Evelyn | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 36% | 10% | |
| 15 | DAYAL Saahira | 7% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 16 | ENRILE Erica | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 6% |
| 17 | LEE Olivia | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 18 | BARNOW Sasha | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
| 19 | XU Katelyn | - | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | WANG Angelina | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 21 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 22 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 14% | |
| 23 | KIM Jayna | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 58% | 28% |
| 24 | BEAVER Ava | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 25 | BHATT Anisha | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 3% | - |
| 26 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 27 | BARG Daniella | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 28 | WANG Jessie | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 29 | LIN Ariel | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 30 | WANG Zoe | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | YIN Gabriela | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 32 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 45% | 18% | |
| 33 | GUO Luxi | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 34 | BUSH Emma | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 21% | |
| 35 | BLANCO Ariia | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | ZHANG ANGELA | - | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 37 | MENDOZA zoie | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | BO GENESIS | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 40 | CHUNG Penelope | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | CHANG Abigail | 7% | 47% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | BARG Margaret | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 43 | WANG Victoria | 1% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 44 | IYER Ishana | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 45 | MA Ashley | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | XU Bonnie Jia Li | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 47 | CAMAMA Tessa | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 48 | LIANG Jingjing | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 49 | JI Catherine | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 50 | CHEN Samantha | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 51 | WANG Sara | 7% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | HASIM Eurietta | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | MOLLINIER Anais | 1% | 18% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 54 | KWON Genevie | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 55 | XU Celina | 12% | 42% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | JIANG Xinchen | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | BEATIE Isabella M. | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 58 | MULAGARI Swarasai | 46% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | DING Grace | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 60 | HAMILTON Nessa | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 61 | BROWN Riley | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 62 | BARDIN Kira | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 63 | LAI Amanda | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 64 | GITI Aria | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | PATTERSON Liliya | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | YOUSSEF Caroline | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 67 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 24% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | LEE Yeriel | 26% | 45% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | KIM Isabella | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 70 | LEE Valerie | 8% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 71 | LEE Emma | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 72 | JAMES Ashley | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.