Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
2 | LEE Natasha | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
3 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 32% |
3 | YAO Yilin | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
5 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% |
6 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
7 | LEE Olivia | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
8 | SU Evelyn | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
9 | QURESHI Nisa | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
10 | WANG Ziqi | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 1% |
11 | LEE Camilla | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
12 | WANG Angelina | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 3% |
13 | XU Katelyn | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
14 | MUN Brianna K. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
15 | BARG Daniella | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 40% | 10% |
16 | BARG Margaret | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
17 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
18 | KIM Jayna | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
19 | MARTYNOVA Diana | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
20 | LEE REGINA | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
20 | HSIU Elizabeth | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
22 | BARBARA Camille | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
23 | CHANG Celine A. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 6% |
24 | BUSH Emma | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
25 | HUANG Lanlan | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
25 | WANG Jessie | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
27 | PHUKAN Indra | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
28 | MANDAP Svetlanna | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
29 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
30 | XU Bonnie Jia Li | - | 4% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
30 | MULAGARI Swarasai | 61% | 33% | 5% | < 1% | - | - | - |
32 | SHELIN Chelsea | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
33 | LIU Baihan | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | - |
34 | GUO Luxi | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
35 | XU Celina | 10% | 39% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
36 | HASIM Eurietta | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
37 | OBERDERFER Viktoriia | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
38 | YIN Gabriela | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
39 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
40 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
41 | LAI Amanda | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
42 | GUESNARD Maelig | 12% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
43 | BLANCO Ariia | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
44 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
44 | BARDIN Kira | 35% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
46 | ESTRADA Ariana | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
46 | CHANG Abigail | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
48 | ZHANG ANGELA | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
49 | POON Desiree | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
50 | WANG Victoria | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
51 | LIN Ariel | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
52 | ENRILE Erica | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
53 | HAMILTON Nessa | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
54 | MITRANI Gabriela | 5% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
55 | BROWN Riley | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
56 | LIANG Jingjing | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
57 | BHATT Anisha | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
58 | MA Ashley | 14% | 53% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
59 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
59 | JI Catherine | 3% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
61 | KIM Isabella | 27% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
62 | BO GENESIS | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
63 | IINO Kennedy | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.