Crescent City Open

Veteran Men’s Foil (VETMF)

Saturday, November 2, 2024 at 1:00 PM

Register

Riverside Hilton - New Orleans, LA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2271 2739 - 2048
5 - 8 1675 1722 - 1640
9 - 16 1740 2438 - 1373
17 - 25 1263 2079 - 575

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Flanagan, James Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club B24 2739 2439.10
2 de Barros Conti, Thibaut Fencing Institute Of Texas E24 2168 1756.14
3 Hernandez, Marc Austin Fencers Club D23 2048 1668.22
4 Marcus, Peter Indianapolis Fencing Club E24 2130 1598.02
5 Mahnken, Thomas Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. E24 1663 1358.72
6 RODRIGUEZ, VINCENT San Diego Fencing Center E24 1722 1357.03
7 Poole, James Galveston Fencing Club E24 1674 1295.69
8 Towster, Robert Bayou City Fencing Academy E23 1640 1274.80
9 O'Connor, Ryan Red Stick School Of Fencing E22 1769 1271.63
10 Precciozzi, Aldo Space City Fencing Academy U 1667 1256.16
11 Exnicios, Richard New Orleans Fencers Club E24 1591 1178.90
12 Lesniak, Chuck Austin Fencers Club E24 1558 1104.72
13 Newell, Tim Bayou City Fencing Academy U 1373 1065.96
14 Gardner, William Boise Fencing Club U 1666 980.24
15 Kong, Raymond Pegasus Sword Academy Inc. U 1861 897.87
16 Quarles, Mark Mississippi Fencing Club U 2438 870.95
17 Eilts, Bruce Red Stick School Of Fencing U 1676 669.45
18 Chao, Pierre Rockville Fencing Academy U 1099 613.57
19 Geller, Alan Rain City Fencing Center E24 1385 576.43
20 Zaidi, Sohail OnTarget Fencing Club U 1141 478.96
21 Danton, Gary Masters Fencing Club U 1288 448.22
22 Hebert, David Escrime D'Acadie U 987 445.96
23 Jenkins, Michael Fencers Club Inc. U 575 < 0
24 Wojcik, Edward New Orleans Fencers Club U 2079 < 0
25 Keough, Andy Central Arkansas Fencing Club U 1138 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!