Crescent City Open

Veteran Men’s Foil (VETMF)

Saturday, November 2, 2024 at 1:00 PM

Register

Riverside Hilton - New Orleans, LA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2115 2612 - 1708
5 - 8 1734 1790 - 1688
9 - 16 1598 1857 - 1206
17 - 26 1578 2500 - 729

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Flanagan, James Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club B24 2612 2257.39
2 Hernandez, Marc Austin Fencers Club D23 2136 1589.65
3 Marcus, Peter Indianapolis Fencing Club E24 2005 1391.66
4 Mahnken, Thomas Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. E24 1708 1370.94
5 Towster, Robert Bayou City Fencing Academy E23 1790 1321.71
6 Poole, James Galveston Fencing Club E24 1751 1308.41
7 RODRIGUEZ, VINCENT San Diego Fencing Center E24 1688 1254.24
8 Exnicios, Richard New Orleans Fencers Club E24 1707 1179.43
9 de Barros Conti, Thibaut Fencing Institute Of Texas E24 1742 1062.94
10 O'Connor, Ryan Red Stick School Of Fencing E22 1761 1010.91
11 Newell, Tim Bayou City Fencing Academy U 1395 1009.73
12 Precciozzi, Aldo Space City Fencing Academy U 1671 928.84
13 Eilts, Bruce Red Stick School Of Fencing U 1857 744.59
14 Geller, Alan Rain City Fencing Center E24 1715 686.65
15 Chao, Pierre Rockville Fencing Academy U 1206 645.54
16 Lesniak, Chuck Austin Fencers Club E24 1440 624.96
17 Danton, Gary Masters Fencing Club U 1372 400.13
18 Zaidi, Sohail OnTarget Fencing Club U 1054 243.01
19 Wemple, Charles Bayou City Fencing Academy U 729 126.16
20 Hebert, David Escrime D'Acadie U 1407 70.34
21 Jenkins, Michael Fencers Club Inc. U 736 0.19
22 Wojcik, Edward New Orleans Fencers Club U 2500 < 0
23 Kong, Raymond Pegasus Sword Academy Inc. U 2500 < 0
24 Quarles, Mark Mississippi Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
25 Keough, Andy Central Arkansas Fencing Club U 1584 < 0
26 Gardner, William Boise Fencing Club U 1398 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!