Crescent City Open

Veteran Men’s Foil (VETMF)

Saturday, November 2, 2024 at 1:00 PM

Register

Riverside Hilton - New Orleans, LA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2292 2769 - 2043
5 - 8 1699 1717 - 1676
9 - 16 1738 2438 - 1314
17 - 25 1276 2079 - 646

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Flanagan, James Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club B24 2769 2458.77
2 Hernandez, Marc Austin Fencers Club D23 2225 1786.45
3 Marcus, Peter Indianapolis Fencing Club E24 2130 1598.02
4 de Barros Conti, Thibaut Fencing Institute Of Texas E24 2043 1576.82
5 Mahnken, Thomas Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. E24 1676 1367.79
6 Poole, James Galveston Fencing Club E24 1717 1327.04
7 Towster, Robert Bayou City Fencing Academy E23 1688 1285.68
8 Exnicios, Richard New Orleans Fencers Club E24 1715 1239.88
9 Precciozzi, Aldo Space City Fencing Academy U 1693 1229.93
10 O'Connor, Ryan Red Stick School Of Fencing E22 1824 1225.41
11 RODRIGUEZ, VINCENT San Diego Fencing Center E24 1619 1215.86
12 Lesniak, Chuck Austin Fencers Club E24 1630 1138.29
13 Gardner, William Boise Fencing Club U 1709 999.60
14 Newell, Tim Bayou City Fencing Academy U 1314 975.00
15 Quarles, Mark Mississippi Fencing Club U 2438 870.95
16 Eilts, Bruce Red Stick School Of Fencing U 1676 669.45
17 Chao, Pierre Rockville Fencing Academy U 1138 642.24
18 Geller, Alan Rain City Fencing Center E24 1466 611.56
19 Kong, Raymond Pegasus Sword Academy Inc. U 1616 540.49
20 Danton, Gary Masters Fencing Club U 1288 448.22
21 Zaidi, Sohail OnTarget Fencing Club U 1040 337.81
22 Hebert, David Escrime D'Acadie U 1008 334.60
23 Jenkins, Michael Fencers Club Inc. U 646 < 0
24 Wojcik, Edward New Orleans Fencers Club U 2079 < 0
25 Keough, Andy Central Arkansas Fencing Club U 1201 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!