Crescent City Open

Veteran Men’s Foil (VETMF)

Saturday, November 2, 2024 at 1:00 PM

Register

Riverside Hilton - New Orleans, LA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2288 2769 - 2066
5 - 8 1668 1715 - 1626
9 - 16 1679 2438 - 1202
17 - 25 1351 2079 - 660

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Flanagan, James Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club B24 2769 2458.77
2 Hernandez, Marc Austin Fencers Club D23 2188 1737.11
3 Marcus, Peter Indianapolis Fencing Club E24 2130 1598.02
4 de Barros Conti, Thibaut Fencing Institute Of Texas E24 2066 1580.38
5 Mahnken, Thomas Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. E24 1626 1313.88
6 Poole, James Galveston Fencing Club E24 1715 1311.78
7 Towster, Robert Bayou City Fencing Academy E23 1678 1271.22
8 RODRIGUEZ, VINCENT San Diego Fencing Center E24 1651 1242.66
9 Exnicios, Richard New Orleans Fencers Club E24 1715 1239.88
10 O'Connor, Ryan Red Stick School Of Fencing E22 1824 1225.41
11 Precciozzi, Aldo Space City Fencing Academy U 1660 1165.80
12 Lesniak, Chuck Austin Fencers Club E24 1615 1107.57
13 Newell, Tim Bayou City Fencing Academy U 1309 964.68
14 Gardner, William Boise Fencing Club U 1672 907.16
15 Quarles, Mark Mississippi Fencing Club U 2438 870.95
16 Chao, Pierre Rockville Fencing Academy U 1202 678.20
17 Eilts, Bruce Red Stick School Of Fencing U 1676 669.45
18 Geller, Alan Rain City Fencing Center E24 1466 611.56
19 Kong, Raymond Pegasus Sword Academy Inc. U 1616 540.49
20 Danton, Gary Masters Fencing Club U 1366 481.13
21 Hebert, David Escrime D'Acadie U 1077 333.89
22 Zaidi, Sohail OnTarget Fencing Club U 1019 233.02
23 Jenkins, Michael Fencers Club Inc. U 660 < 0
24 Wojcik, Edward New Orleans Fencers Club U 2079 < 0
25 Keough, Andy Central Arkansas Fencing Club U 1201 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!