SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Zoe | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 2 | MORALES Jessica Y. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% |
| 3 | TZOU Alexandra | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 53% |
| 3 | LEE Hannah | - | 2% | 9% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 5 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 6 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 7 | GHOSH Priyanka | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 8 | GRAFF Sophie | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% |
| 9 | DRAGON Rainer | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
| 10 | SAYLES Nina R. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% |
| 11 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 17% |
| 12 | HASSANEIN Toqa | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 13 | XIKES Katherine E. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 15 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 16 | CHEN Xiaohan | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 17 | LEVITIS Danielle | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 18 | LEE Sophia | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 19 | CHEN Ashley | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 20 | YUAN Greta | 1% | 8% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 21% | 3% |
| 22 | YANG Ashley M. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 23 | BILILIES Sophia | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | LI Victoria J. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 25 | JEONG Katie | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 26 | DANK Dina | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 27 | LU Elaine | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | NAYAK Anika | 13% | 48% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | PAUL Lila | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 30 | RIZKALA Joanna | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 31 | NATH Trisha | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | DAI Olivia | 51% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 35 | FESTA Carina | 1% | 10% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | HE Lizbeth | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 37 | STONE Hava S. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 38 | NAYAK Esha | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% |
| 40 | LI Angela | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 41 | FANG Sabrina | 1% | 9% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | BERNSTEIN Aiden S. | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | WANG Jianning | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | YEN Natalie | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | < 1% | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 47 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 3% |
| 48 | JOHNSTON Lily | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | SPRINGER Ella | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | YOUNG Audrey | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | ZHANG Sophie | 9% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | REN Xinling | 6% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 54 | PATNAIK Nastassia | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | ZHANG Ruijia Alexa | 26% | 40% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | ZONG Meichen | 62% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.