Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% | |
| 2 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% | |
| 3 | BREKER Anika | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
| 3 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | - | - | 9% | 35% | 44% | 13% | |
| 5 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
| 6 | WANG Ellen | - | - | 2% | 13% | 44% | 41% | |
| 7 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 1% | 14% | 44% | 35% | 6% | |
| 8 | HE Fenghuan | - | < 1% | 5% | 25% | 47% | 23% | |
| 9 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% |
| 10 | SHEN Lydia | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 14% | |
| 11 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 57% | 18% | |
| 12 | ZHENG Julie | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 13 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 43% | 10% | |
| 14 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | 2% | 20% | 45% | 28% | 4% | |
| 15 | XUE Alanna L. | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% | |
| 16 | DU Hannah | 1% | 10% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 1% | |
| 17 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 14% |
| 18 | TSAI Xiao-Qing E. | - | - | - | 3% | 32% | 64% | |
| 19 | FU Qihan | - | 7% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 2% | |
| 20 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
| 21 | WU Irene M. | - | 6% | 33% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 22 | CHARALEL Jessica | 17% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 3% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 24 | LIN Zhi tong | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | SHA Yi Ling | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | - | 22% | 50% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | XIANG Emma | 4% | 26% | 48% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | GU Emily | 1% | 11% | 44% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 6% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 2% | |
| 30 | WANG Jasmine | 2% | 44% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 2% | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 33 | ZHOU Catherine | 19% | 50% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 34 | MEYER Claudia | 42% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | MING YUE | 6% | 36% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | LUH Mia P. | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | RICHARDS Ella | 59% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | YANG Alice | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | EXNICIOS Nancy P. | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | TURNER Stephanie E. | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | JIANG Claire | 51% | 40% | 9% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | ZHENG Ying | 93% | 7% | - | - | - | - | |
| 43 | HOU Wendong | 22% | 56% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.