Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | LIN Elaine | - | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 30% |
| 2 | CHA Eugenie | - | 4% | 31% | 44% | 18% | 2% |
| 3 | WONG Alexandra R. | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 21% |
| 3 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | 7% | 31% | 43% | 19% | |
| 5 | EDWARDS Auprell | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 6 | TRAN Helena | 1% | 8% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
| 7 | BENNETT Olivia | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 8 | SMUK Daria A. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 9 | LI Fei | 5% | 42% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
| 10 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 11 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 25% |
| 12 | GUJJA Misha | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% |
| 13 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 27% | |
| 14 | PRIHODKO Nina | - | 10% | 36% | 40% | 14% | |
| 15 | BALSKUS Sophia | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% |
| 16 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 17 | SONG Angela | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 18 | BYK Laura | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 19 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% |
| 20 | SHU Youshan | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% |
| 21 | AI Amy | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
| 22 | LI Alisha | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 23 | ZHENG Linden | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | HICKS Grace | 3% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 6% | |
| 25 | POIRIER Ariane | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 31% |
| 26 | AZMEH nour | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
| 27 | REYNOLDS Nancy | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
| 28 | SOTELO Michelle | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | SAAL Anna | - | 6% | 29% | 44% | 21% | |
| 30 | LIN Ashley | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 31 | RYDMAN Grace | 34% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | TIBBETTS Lily | 81% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | MASTRONARDI Laura | - | 5% | 35% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 34 | DENG Annie | - | 5% | 28% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
| 35 | PAYNE Elizabeth | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | SOMOL Emma | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | ZOU Jiayi-Hannah | 49% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | SANLIKOL Suzan | 12% | 64% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | HUANG Ziyan | 28% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | JENSEN MJ | 19% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 43 | COVINO Mila | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 44 | CONNOLLY Natasha | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | SONG Jaeyi | 30% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | BECK Sara | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.