Hugh Mills Physical Education Complex - Gainesville, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 15% |
2 | HONG Steven | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
3 | SCHNEIDER Allen J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% |
3 | XUE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
5 | DILLE Jackson K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 13% | 1% |
6 | DOARES Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% |
7 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
8 | AN Damon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
9 | ARDOIN Cameron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 8% | |
10 | HARDISON Terry (Reno) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
11 | MONTALVO Emmeric | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 2% | - |
12 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
13 | DILLE Carolina G. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
14 | SHANKWILER Christopher | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
15 | GRAHAM Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 3% |
16 | PALEO Gabriella | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
17 | SEOL Kyung | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 20% | 1% | |
18 | JAYASANKAR Hari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 22% | 3% |
19 | BALLOU Johnathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 33% | 6% | - |
20 | MONTALVO Ashur | 100% | 87% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
21 | YANG Jenny J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
22 | LOFGREN Reese | 100% | 97% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
23 | CROWLEY James | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% | 7% | |
24 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | |
25 | HENRY Dillon P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 18% |
26 | VAN NIMWEGEN Nicholas | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
27 | XIE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
28 | BOWMAN Tamara E. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
29 | LEDON Ava | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
30 | SCHIPPER Bonnie | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
31 | PRUITT Jadie | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | |
32 | REN Dayou | 100% | 97% | 75% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
33 | KALE Omkar | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | - | - |
34 | RYAN Alyssa | 100% | 81% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - |
35 | MUSSELMAN Matthew | 100% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
36 | DENG Brooke | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% | - | |
37 | LE Kyle | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
38 | STEWART Madeline | 100% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
39 | LAMBERT Nicole | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
40 | WHITLEY Alexis | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.