2022 UGA Open

Div III Mixed Épée

Sunday, January 23, 2022 at 8:15 AM

Hugh Mills Physical Education Complex - Gainesville, GA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 MCDANIELS Jeremy 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 60% 19%
2 RACHEL Dylan 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 34% 6%
3 SNYDER Ari 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 36% 8%
3 ZHANG Eric 100% 98% 85% 58% 26% 7% 1%
5 BASKIN Miles 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 16%
6 DILLE Jackson K. 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 15% 1%
7 TAM Ethan 100% 100% 94% 63% 23% 4% -
8 CAMPBELL Joseph L. 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 6%
9 ARUN Vikhyat 100% 100% 97% 86% 59% 26% 5%
10 HUTTO Joshua 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 51% 15%
11 LEADBETTER Gordon 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 32% 6%
12 JEON Hwidong 100% 100% 99% 95% 75% 39% 9%
13 MARSHALL Wesley 100% 100% 100% 99% 81% 23%
14 BURNETTE Aidan 100% 97% 77% 40% 11% 1%
15 KERTESZ Stefan G. 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 44% 9%
16 HAN Ethan 100% 99% 88% 61% 27% 7% 1%
17 BERNSTEIN Matthew B. 100% 98% 81% 41% 10% 1%
18 WANG Aidan 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 28% 5%
19 DULISSE ALeX 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 54% 17%
20 LIN Kason 100% 86% 51% 18% 3% < 1% -
21 JUNG Elliot 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 26%
22 SPURLIN Alicen 100% 100% 97% 86% 59% 25% 5%
23 PARK Judy 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 4%
24 WEBSTER Davis G. 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 12%
25 CORLEY Avery 100% 99% 93% 72% 38% 11% 1%
25 NGUYEN Audrey 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 37% 7%
27 BERNARD Jack B. 100% 99% 90% 64% 31% 8% 1%
28 LOUBSER Dillon 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 37%
29 LIU Dylan Y. 100% 100% 94% 71% 30% 4%
30 RAY Jacob 100% 100% 99% 90% 66% 30% 6%
31 MURRAY Kerk 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 50% 11%
32 RUSCONI Jane 100% 97% 79% 39% 8% 1%
33 PULLEN Ayah 100% 99% 77% 38% 10% 1%
34 SANDERS Charlotte 100% 99% 93% 68% 31% 7% 1%
35 BYBEE Lucy J. 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 31% 7%
36 WANG Bryan 100% 98% 83% 53% 21% 4% -
37 SOTTILE Cole 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 12%
37 GUDAPATI Rahul 100% 100% 98% 87% 53% 14%
39 LIU Kevin 100% 98% 85% 55% 21% 4% -
40 SCHERNIKAU Jack 100% 98% 86% 54% 20% 3% -
41 LEE Daehyeon 100% 98% 83% 45% 14% 2% -
42 PAEK Sean 100% 99% 92% 66% 32% 9% 1%
43 KOKA Ashwin 100% 100% 96% 76% 36% 8% -
44 PATIL Amulya 100% 100% 99% 94% 76% 41% 10%
45 EDWARDS Darby 100% 97% 71% 30% 6% 1% -
46 DEWITT Sarah 100% 93% 65% 28% 6% 1% -
46 ILENRE Roni 100% 83% 44% 13% 2% - -
48 CHANG Shane 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 28% 5%
49 NEELAM Neha 100% 98% 85% 50% 15% 2%
50 MOON Seojung 100% 100% 94% 69% 31% 6%
51 NICKERSON Edward 100% 98% 82% 44% 10% 1%
52 MCDANIEL Eamon 100% 93% 58% 19% 2% -
53 LE Kevin 100% 99% 92% 68% 34% 9% 1%
54 HALL Dorothy Corrina 100% 94% 66% 29% 7% 1% -
55 CHOI David 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 49% 14%
56 AHN Yuchan 100% 99% 89% 61% 26% 6% -
57 COMER John 100% 63% 22% 4% - - -
58 CORDOVA Colin 100% 99% 89% 62% 27% 6% -
59 WANG Zarina 100% 88% 52% 18% 3% - -
60 GRAHAM Caleb 100% 100% 95% 79% 48% 17% 3%
61 MIHALIK Alva 100% 96% 70% 29% 7% 1% -
62 MIA Raj 100% 95% 72% 34% 9% 1% -
63 DAVIS Elisabeth 100% 82% 40% 11% 2% - -
64 SINGLETON Jacob 100% 99% 93% 71% 38% 11% 1%
65 MOSS Riley 100% 54% 15% 2% - - -
66 HERNANDEZ Kevin 100% 97% 76% 33% 4% -
67 LIU Nick 100% 73% 31% 7% 1% -
68 KUMAR Anusha 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 5% -
69 WATKINS Nathan 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 22% 3%
70 JAAFAR Hamza 100% 54% 15% 2% - - -
71 WILKENS Patricia A. 100% 95% 73% 37% 10% 1% -
72 ROZET Alice 100% 95% 67% 28% 6% 1% -
73 CANTELOW Sophia 100% 100% 96% 80% 48% 17% 3%
74 MILLER Jonathan 100% 93% 63% 25% 5% 1% -
75 MARTIN John J. 100% 97% 84% 56% 26% 7% 1%
76 MARTIN Tessa 100% 74% 29% 6% 1% - -
77 MCCREARY Madeleine 100% 46% 10% 1% - -
78 RIGGINS James 100% 98% 84% 52% 19% 3% -
79 SNYDER Kathryn 100% 56% 16% 2% - -
80 WILEY Morgan 100% 98% 86% 59% 27% 7% 1%
81 VILLAMOR Lea 100% 94% 64% 27% 6% 1% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.