Air Force ROC/RJCC

Division II Men’s Epee (DV2ME)

Sunday, September 29, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

Air Force Cadet Field House - Colorado Springs, CO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2587 2965 - 2137
5 - 8 2040 2193 - 1897
9 - 16 1813 2004 - 1491
17 - 25 1739 2500 - 1159

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Gasparovich, George US Air Force Academy NCAA University C23 2965 2589.10
2 Wu, Alistair Rain City Fencing Center C24 2546 2198.33
3 Jan, Timothy Boise Fencing Club C24 2700 1849.09
4 Aggeler, Donovan Northern Colorado Fencers C24 2137 1821.39
5 Shull, Marc Windy City Fencing-Chicago D23 2130 1783.02
6 Guo, Woody True Focus Sports Academy D24 1941 1680.86
7 Ferrell-Carretey, Elliot High Plains Fencing Guild D23 2193 1625.36
8 Miley, Walker Northern Colorado Fencers E24 1897 1606.33
9 Muenke, Magnus Northern Colorado Fencers E24 1964 1604.12
10 Marencik, Miles Denver Fencing Center D24 1813 1455.65
11 Reagan, Henry City of Thunder FC C24 2004 1366.68
12 Puttamraju, Nikhil Phoenix Falcons Fencing Club C24 1776 1352.49
13 Isaacson, Calev Rocky Mountain Fencing Academy E24 1951 1255.67
14 Daniels, Jonathan Bozeman Fencing Association, LLC C24 1956 1251.68
15 Emerson, Zachary Denver Fencing Center E23 1549 1181.10
16 Reid, Wesley South Denver Fencing Academy E24 1491 1105.33
17 Schwitzer, Eliot Denver Fencing Center U 1462 1061.31
18 Brooks, Justin Denver Fencing Center E24 1639 1039.50
19 Wilson, Trevor High Plains Fencing Guild U 1663 980.36
20 Wachs, Bryce NMFC/Duke City Fencing C23 1484 711.21
21 Samarripa, Max Northern Colorado Fencers U 2496 606.30
22 Miller, Joshua High Plains Fencing Guild U 1435 210.83
23 Muenke, Torben Northern Colorado Fencers U 1817 169.41
24 Cosgrove, Franklin Lincoln Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
25 Lonadier, Robert Marx Fencing Academy U 1159 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!