Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOLMES Stuart S. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 2 | LOCKWOOD Owen | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 8% |
| 3 | HOLMES Andrew E. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 64% |
| 3 | LIU Niles J. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 55% |
| 5 | CANDESCU Cristian | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 6 | PRILUTSKY David B. | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 7 | SINGH Dayaal | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 47% | 17% |
| 8 | ZHANG Henry C. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
| 9 | GEE Brandon | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 10 | TUMMINGS C.J. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 11 | CHAN Tyler | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 12 | LEUNG Wai Chi Ethan | - | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 13 | MARSHALL Ian | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 14 | KIM Yonjae | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | WU Wesley E. | - | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 16 | BAE Kevin | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 17 | FRITZ Ayden R. | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | LIN Richard W. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
| 19 | YU Vinni | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 20 | HU Robin | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 22 | DU Samuel R. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | SCHULTES Evans | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 15% | |
| 24 | REGE Advaith | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 3% |
| 25 | LIAO Alex J. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 26 | HO Ryan J. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 27 | HERGERT Benito | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 28 | ONIK Elijah T. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 29 | GILBERT-GOLDSTEIN Avery E. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 46% |
| 30 | SHA Yi Peng | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LIU Eric P. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% |
| 32 | WEINKOPF William O. | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 33 | ADLER David R. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 34 | LEE Daniel C. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 35 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | LE Vyn A. | 2% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 37 | BATRAK Alexander | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 38 | HEWES Thomas G. | - | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 39 | BADRIGIAN William H. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 40 | ORTIZ Zachary M. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 41 | MARX Oscar L. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 42 | JACKSON Malcolm | 12% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 44 | SANTULLI Tristan | 7% | 34% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | DING Jonathan | - | 1% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 45 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | JANG Jaewon | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
| 48 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | NAGER Noah | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | BICKFORD Michael S. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 51 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 7% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | BUERGIN Aidan | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
| 54 | WANG Gerald Y. | 21% | 52% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 55 | KIZHNER Fillip | 21% | 43% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | ZHAO Jesse | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | GALBAN Matthias L. | 14% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | ANTON Nathaniel | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 59 | STURGIS Zachary C. | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | BOISLARD Adam J. | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | TIAN Yuzhe (Charlie) | - | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 62 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | GEORGE Michael | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | VALENTON Timothy | 54% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | HENSLEY Todd | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 66 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 7% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 67 | MENG Zhaoyi | 5% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 68 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 69 | BAO Wenyuan | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | YU Dale | 45% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 71 | TIAN Aaron C. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 71 | STRAYER Andrew | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 73 | KEANNA Peter | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 74 | MUNDAHL Morgan K. | 20% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | MURPHY Damian J. | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 75 | BARRAL FLOC'H Roman | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.